Companies struggle as Safari pops up on networks
Network administrators are complaining that Apple's recent decision to offer
users its Safari Web browser as part of an iTunes and QuickTime update has made
their lives harder, as they struggle to remove the software from PCs on their
networks.
For Cody Wilson, the trouble began a few weeks ago, when he noticed that Safari
had popped up as a download option with his Apple Software Update, the program
that is used to update iTunes and QuickTime.
Wilson, a network administrator with Soy Capital Bank and Trust in Decatur,
Illinois, soon found out that many of the users on his network had installed
the software without realizing it. "I went into work the next day and I
scanned my network, and my inventory software said I have Safari on 30 PCs,"
he said.
Because of the way Apple had configured the update, anyone who clicked OK automatically
installed the company's Web browser. Most users thought that Safari was simply
a component of the Apple software they'd already installed, Wilson said.
"This is not good; this is a security risk," he said. "We're
a bank."
Wilson said it has taken him the better part of a week to remove Safari from
his network and prevent it from being reinstalled.
In an e-mail interview, Susan Bradley agreed that the updates are creating
a problem for administrators and making users less secure. "It impacts
all of us when more potential attack surface is installed in a group of folks
that are vulnerable enough as it is," said Bradley, who is chief technology
officer with Tamiyasu, Smith, Horn and Braun, Accountancy Corp.
On Friday, patch management vendor Shavlik Technologies announced that it had
updated its Shavlik NetChk Protect software to detect and remove Safari.
Administrators may see more support calls from users who have installed Safari
without realizing it, said Eric Schultze, chief technology officer with Shavlik.
"I could see administrators saying, 'I approved a standard desktop image,
now [Safari is] showing up. I need to remove it.'"
One poster to the Patchmanagement discussion list described
the situation more bluntly.
"What's the difference between a malware spreading across a corporate
environment and a nagging system tray icon that installs another insecure default
browser," wrote the poster, who identified himself as Emin.
IDG News Service
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
jfruh
Apple syncing patent can't come soon enough
pasmith
New Twitter features borrow from 3rd party clients
Esther Schindler
Open Source Changes the Software Acquisition Process
mikelgan
How to set up continuous podcast play on the new iTunes
David Strom
Five important Windows 7 mobility features
sjvn
Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Grepping on Whole Words
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.













