RIAA says Google piracy policies are lacking

Google's Transparency Report on requests from copyright holders to halt access to URLs is misleading, say RIAA officials

By , Computerworld |  Security, Google, piracy

According to the RIAA's Buckles, however, the report isn't fully factual.

Buckles said that Google for places "artificial limits" on the number of queries that can be made by copyright holders to identify what they believe is infringing material.

"The number of queries they allow is miniscule, especially when you consider that Google handles more than 3 billion searches per day," he noted. "Google has denied requests to remove this barrier to finding the infringements."

Buckles accused Google of limiting the daily number of URL takedown requests that copyright holders can make using an automated Google tool. He also claimed that Google does nothing to prevent the fast creation of new links to infringing files.

For example, Buckles cites a website containing over 300 separate unauthorized copies of the same song that continues to be available via Google search despite several RIAA takedown notices.

"If 'take down' does not mean 'keep down,' then Google's limitations merely perpetuate the fraud wrought on copyright owners by those who game the system under the [Digital Millennium Copyright Act]," he said.

The RIAA's ability to find infringements is limited to what Google wants to show the trade body, contends an RIAA source who asked not to be named. "Our ability to send notices on those infringements is limited to a number they've come up with. One limitation leads to the next limitation. None of which is mentioned in its Transparency Report," the RIAA source said.

A Google spokeswoman today said the company doesn't impose limits on the number of Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) notices that a copyright owner or reporting organization can submit.

"We do have some technical safeguards in our trusted partner program (where submitters may be using automated mechanisms to send large volumes) as a safeguard against accidental flooding of the system," the spokeswoman said in an email to Computerworld.

A source close to Google noted that the RIAA complaints are curious because Microsoft has been able to put in about 10 times as many takedown requests as the RIAA. The numbers seem to undercut the RIAA claims about artificial limits, the source said.

Jaikumar Vijayan covers data security and privacy issues, financial services security and e-voting for Computerworld. Follow Jaikumar on Twitter at @jaivijayan, or subscribe to Jaikumar's RSS feed . His e-mail address is jvijayan@computerworld.com.

Read more about security in Computerworld's Security Topic Center.

Originally published on Computerworld |  Click here to read the original story.
Join us:






Answers - Powered by ITworld

ITworld Answers helps you solve problems and share expertise. Ask a question or take a crack at answering the new questions below.

Ask a Question