May 03, 2013, 10:28 AM — A special court established to review government requests for warrants to conduct electronic surveillance of suspected foreign spies received close to 1,900 warrant requests last year -- all of which it approved.
A report released earlier this week by the U.S. Department of Justice to the Senate shows the government in 2012 made 1,856 requests with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) for authority to conduct electronic and physical surveillance for foreign intelligence purposes. Of those, 1,789 were explicitly for electronic surveillance of suspects. The rest were for either physical surveillance alone or a combination of both.
The government later withdrew one of its warrant requests and the FISC modified 40 of the proposed orders. But in the end, the court did not reject a single surveillance request from the government either wholly or in part, in 2012.
The same was true of the government's requests for access to business records of individuals suspected of spying on the U.S. The government made 212 applications to the FISC for access to the business records of such individuals and the court approved all of them. In this case, however, the court made modifications to 200 of the requests but it is unclear what those modifications were.
The numbers released by the DOJ represent a 16.7% increase over similar requests in 2011. They are sure to focus attention once again on the government's use of the controversial FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to keep tabs on foreign spies.
The FISA Amendments Act of 2008 amends the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978. It was set to expire on Dec. 31, 2012, but was extended for another four years by the U.S. Senate on Dec. 28 and signed into law by President Obama two days later.
The statute is an anti-terror measure that authorizes U.S. intelligence agencies to conduct surveillance, including electronic wiretapping, of foreign nationals in the U.S and overseas who are believed to pose a national security risk. Proponents of the measure have described it as a vital tool in the fight against terrorism. They maintain that concerns about how the law is used are overblown and insist that it is used purely to keep an eye on those seeking to harm the U.S.