Google StreetView: Privacy doesn't exist
Google has been accused of hypocrisy after the search engine defended its Street View tool by saying "complete privacy doesn't exist."
Street View, which has just been given the go-ahead in the U.K., is an add-on to Google Maps and Google Earth that offers photographs of streets and cities. However, many of the photos feature passers-by who have been caught unawares. This has lead to a number of privacy concerns and in some cases even lawsuits against Google.
Google's comments were filled in papers responding to legal proceedings started by U.S. couple Aaron and Christine Boring following the publication of images of their home on Street View. The pair claim Google's "reckless conduct has caused mental suffering" and decreased the value of their home. They are seeking damages of more than US$25,000.
Ken Boehm, chairman of the U.S. National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC), said that "Google's hypocrisy is breathtaking."
"Perhaps in Google's world privacy does not exist," said Mr Boehm, "but in the real world individual privacy is fundamentally important and is being chipped away bit by bit every day by companies like Google."
Google issued a statement regarding its comments: "The response quotes and expands upon an existing legal opinion to help frame the response. It should not be interpreted as a blanket statement on our views towards privacy."
» posted by abennett
PC Advisor
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
On Twitter now
privacy
Powered by TwitterOn Twitter now
privacy
Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers
Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal
Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants
pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal
sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7
claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading
mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much
Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview
Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
- Ubuntu advances: Why Ubuntu server installations will surge in 2010
- Social media marketing: How to make friends with benefits
- More...
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.







am not really against it ..
am not really against it .. there are more good points to street by street than bad points