Pros and Cons of VMware's New Security Guide

By Edward L. Haletky, CIO.com |  Virtualization, VMware Add a new comment

VMware has released another hardening guideline, this time for VMware Virtual Infrastructure 3.5. Its guidance can also apply to version 3.0, though. This guide is useful in that it actually looks as ESXi as more than an appliance, as does the ESX Security Technical Implementation Guide from the U.S. Defense Information Systems Administration (DISA), which I discussed a couple of weeks ago.

The new version of VMware's guide is a vast improvement over the older one, but still only looks at a subset of the entire virtual environment and still maintains that a directory service is required to secure VMware VI3 .x but gives no information on how to achieve this security. Just use one and all will be well is not a good game plan- it may leave you even less secure than before.

I may have my sights set a little high on what I'd like to see from a hardening guideline. Chris Hoff at Rational Security certainly thinks so, and others may as well.

But I don't think so. I just expect something that states it is a hardening guide to actually harden the system and provide for me the means to perform these actions.

The new VMware Guide does give much more information about hardening the virtual machine from a VI3 perspective.

The latest VMware Guide also delves into ESXi even more than the DISA/STIG guide and this provides some invaluable information for those using ESXi.

Unfortunately not much has changed with respect to ESX. There is still quite a few hardening steps missing from this guide that are covered in the other guides.

The main bits that are missing are the steps necessary to actually implement the security. For example one heading is to Label Virtual Networks Clearly. Do they imply that we should not use IPAddress in the names, or network names, or what? What is the appropriate labeling for the virtual networks?

I would like to see 3 guides from VMware: One for just VMs (from the perspective of the virtual infrastructure); One for ESXi; and one for ESX. I would like all these guides to actually show me how to secure my systems instead of using general terms.

Virtualization expert Edward L. Haletky is the author of "VMWare ESX Server in the Enterprise: Planning and Securing Virtualization Servers," Pearson Education (2008.) He recently left Hewlett-Packard, where he worked in the Virtualization, Linux, and High-Performance Technical Computing teams. Haletky owns AstroArch Consulting, providing virtualization, security, and network consulting and development. Haletky is also a champion and moderator for the VMware discussion forums, providing answers to security and configuration questions.

    Add a comment

    Post a comment using one of these accounts
    Or join now
    At least 6 characters

    Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
    Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
    The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

    ITworld LIVE

    VirtualizationWhite Papers & Webcasts

    White Paper

    AppAssure vs Backup Exec

    In this new Lab Report, openBench Labs examines AppAssure backup and replication software v4.7 with Symantec Backup Exec 2010 R2. AppAssure implements changed-block tracking technology to provide data protection for both virtual and physical servers in specific OS environments. In contrast, Backup Exec 2010 R2 uses traditional file-based backup to promote compatibility with the largest number of operating systems.

    White Paper

    Top 5 Requirements for Backup of Virtual and Physical Servers - Greg Shields, Microsoft MVP

    Reports by leading industry analysts like Gartner, IDC and Concentrated Technology suggest virtual servers in 2011 will eclipse physical servers in total server deployments. The majority of today's business computing environments already have both virtual and physical servers at the same time.

    White Paper

    Lab Report - Optimizing VM Backup for VMware and Hyper-V

    Data centers are becoming more difficult to manage and protect as more data and applications are moved into virtual environments. Adding fuel to the fire, CIOs must now deal with corporate mandates to build an IT infrastructure that scales to unknown demand levels and provides service assurance for fluctuating conditions that cannot be accurately projected. The solution is a transition to a private cloud characterized by a hypervisor-independent Virtual Infrastructure (VI).

    Webcast On Demand

    Managing Enterprise Mobility Costs

    Mobile employees, especially those traveling internationally, were spending time and resources finding and making connections. Roaming costs were out of control. The IT Administrator at The Hay Group tells you how he got more control over these costs, providing management with predictable budgets and insights while ensuring employee productivity.

    Sponsor: iPass

    White Paper

    Forrester Total Economic Impact (TEI) Case Study - Oracle

    In this paper, Forrester Consulting examines the total economic impact and potential return on investment (ROI) realized by three Enterprise organizations as they virtualized mission-critical Oracle databases on the VMware vSphere platform. The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of VMware vSphere on their organizations.

    See more White Papers | Webcasts

    Ask a question

    Ask a Question