Botnets: Reasons It's Getting Harder to Find and Fight Them
The perpetual proliferation of botnets is hardly surprising when one considers just how easy it is for the bad guys to hijack computers without tipping off the users.
Botnets have long used a variety of configurations, in part to disguise their control mechanisms -- see What a Botnet Looks Like. But as user-friendly but insecure applications continue to become available -- especially social networking programs used by the non-tech-savvy -- hackers have an ever growing number of security holes to choose from. They're also getting smarter about building resilient architectures, according to botnet hunters who have monitored recent activity.
[ See also: One bot-infected PC = 600,000 spam messages a day and Gang of six' controls botnet of 1.9 million computers ]
Here are four reasons the botnet fight is getting harder, and what to do about it:
1. Operating below the radar
While much of the attention lately has been on botnet activity related to the Conficker worm (see Conficker Group: Worm 4.6 Million Strong), researchers say some of the largest botnets have largely escaped media attention. And that's how the bad guys like it.
Alex Lanstein, senior security researcher at FireEye Inc., a security vendor based in the San Francisco Bay area, said this is because their overlords don't want to make news and let people know their machines are infected. Cimbot, for example, is a piece of malware that has been used to create a botnet that now accounts for about 15 percent of the world's spam, he said.
Paul Royal, principal researcher at Atlanta-based security vendor Purewire Inc., has found several other examples of botnet herders operating below the radar. In one experiment he participated in, Project ZeroPack, he found that automated obfuscation techniques allow the bad guys to engage in such activities as server-side polymorphism. With malware morphing regularly, traditional antivirus vendors have more trouble keeping up with the right AV signatures. The Waledac botnet has used this method with much success.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
On Twitter now
security
Powered by TwitterOn Twitter now
security
Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers
Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal
Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants
pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal
sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7
claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading
mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much
Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview
Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
- Ubuntu advances: Why Ubuntu server installations will surge in 2010
- Social media marketing: How to make friends with benefits
- More...
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.







How to combat Botnets - 5 letter word
LINUXLinux isn't the answer...
I love it when people pout that Linux is the end all solution for malware. Wrrrong. IF Linux does become more popular- doubtful since M$ and Crapple knows how to market -They'll just target those machines. It's all about the market share.Secondly, Botnets wouldn't exist for the most part if people didn't steal os's and not have them patched, as well as not have any security on them. Go on and pout some more about how Linux doesn't need patches... wrong they do and have been. Why you think there are updates for it? Hell even Ubuntu has a update service much like M$ does.
thin clients
99% of people use their computer for email and web. You don't need a full computer to do these tasks. Thin clients would solve a lot of problems. Small terminals that only do web, and you can't install software on without a firmware upgrade that you download from the manufacturer, and is digitally signed. Maybe even something like an Xbox360 with a mouse and keyboard. How many millions of those are in homes, yet there's no Xbox360 botnet... People need to give up this notion that they need "computers" when really they could everything they need with thin web terminals.