Lose your data, lose your business

2 comments | 5I like it!
April 28, 2009, 02:18 PM —  Network World — 

Disasters, by definition, strike with little or no warning. Whether it's an extended power outage, a devastating storm, or some other unforeseen disruption, the most nerve-wracking part of owning a business is the unknown. But good news: we can prepare effectively to weather even the worst of storms. A solid disaster-recovery (DR) plan can mean the difference between a business bouncing back from a catastrophe or closing for good.

In past Network World contributions, my colleagues have underscored the importance of having DR plans, citing studies that show data losses stemming from IT outages can prove fatal to small businesses more often than most of us would guess. For example, a U.S. National Archives and Records Administration study found that 25% of companies experiencing an IT outage of two to six days went bankrupt immediately, with even more following in the longer term.

The question for every business is, if that kind of disruption happened to you, would you be one of the survivors or one of the casualties?

The core of almost all DR plans is data replication in some form -- duplication and storage of vital data in a safe, secure place where you can retrieve it if some catastrophe destroys or damages the primary location. There are essentially two different data replication strategies: host-based and controller-based.

If your organization has not committed to either yet, keep in mind that it's very difficult to switch from host-based solutions to controller-based solutions because the two aren't compatible. Each is handled differently and uses different components (hardware to software, and vice-versa). If you're unsure about which type is right for your businesses, be sure to seek the guidance of a trusted adviser.

Host-based data replication
Host-based solutions usually are recommended for small businesses as they are the most cost-effective and "easiest" systems to adopt. This type of implementation occurs at an organization's operating level by pairing two separate servers that will each save data, ensuring redundancy. Servers in a host-based system can be paired at a one-to-one level, or with multiple servers-to one location, depending on the needs and capabilities of the organization.

A host-based solution is effective because the back-up server can be deployed remotely, potentially eliminating any need to restart the server should an event occur. In addition, it is very efficient and has a limited footprint, both in terms of office space and energy consumption. However, keep in mind that host-based solutions employ a variety of software systems, all of which likely will require a license.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Close

On Twitter now

security

Powered by Twitter
You are logged in | Sign out
Sign in and post to Twitter

What are you thinking?

Cancel Tweet sent

On Twitter now

Comments

Loss of Data

People should understand exactly how much data is placed in one little cartridge. For wxample: A 3480 cartridge, which started all this only contained 200 megabytes (capacity). Compare its capacity with, for instance, an LTO containing only 800 gyabytes (capacity). That's a ratio of 4000 to 1. Lose the data on one LTO is like losing the data on 4000 3480s.

Does replication make sense--you bet it does!!!

Don Blackburn
(508) 877-2887
Bowindustries@aol.com

| reply

replica bags

Women like jewelry replica bags as men like cars ,yet ,they are more crazy .They also like cloths ,but don't as much as replica handbags .Jewelry give more confident to them ,that why jewelry industries are so lucrative .
| reply
peer-to-peer

jfruh
Apple syncing patent can't come soon enough

pasmith
New Twitter features borrow from 3rd party clients

Esther Schindler
Open Source Changes the Software Acquisition Process

mikelgan
How to set up continuous podcast play on the new iTunes

David Strom
Five important Windows 7 mobility features

sjvn
Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake                        

Sandra Henry-Stocker
Grepping on Whole Words

 

Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Featured Sponsor

AISO founders envisioned a Web hosting company that was environmentally friendly. While the company employed energy-efficient innovations like solar panels, its infrastructure produced unacceptable power and cooling requirements. Find out how AISO leveraged AMD technology to overcome their challenge in this case study white paper.

In this whitepaper, Scalar explores the opportunity to change the landscape with respect to mission critical databases built around Oracle. Leveraging technologies such as Linux, high-end commodity processing power and Oracle RAC technology to architect, design, build and maintain database infrastructure that delivers maximum availability, reliability and performance at a fraction of traditional cost.

On a typical day, weather.com, the Web site for The Weather Channel in Atlanta, serves up between 15 million and 20 million page views. But in September 2004, when back-to-back hurricanes ransacked Florida, the peak traffic on one day more than tripled: over 70 million page views by more than 7 million unique visitors. Read the full success story now.

Marketplace