Silliest 'wiretapping' charges ever recorded
Chi Quang Truong, 46, is being charged by police in Natick, Mass., with "unlawful wiretapping and possessing a device for wiretapping," according to a story in The MetroWest Daily News (my former employer, incidentally).
If you're thinking foreign spy or industrial espionage, think again. ... Try an irate customer who kicked up a fuss at a car dealer's service department.
And that "device for wiretapping?" ... Try nothing more sophisticated than a handheld digital voice recorder; an Olympus, to be precise.
If you cannot imagine what could be going on here, chances are you've not had reason to brush up on the laws governing the tape recording of conversations. (Journalists know all about this stuff.)
Truong's travails began with a beef familiar to all of us: Unsatisfied with the timeliness in which his car was repaired, he demanded $300 compensation from the dealer. His demand was met with a series of counteroffers, which were rebuffed and followed by an escalating confrontation, which resulted in the dealer calling the cops.
From the story: "Police arrested a man they say caused a disturbance at a Honda dealership and who, it was later discovered, had been recording the exchange with a voice recorder in his pocket. Police said Truong became irate and blocked the dealership's service bay with his car. Workers at Bernardi Honda asked Truong to leave and he refused, (Lt. Brian) Grassey said. During his arrest, Truong tried to resist police.
"After officers placed Truong under arrest, Grassey said they discovered an Olympus digital voice recorder in his pocket. Truong didn't say why he was taping, Grassey said."
Truong faces charges of disorderly conduct, resisting arrest and trespassing, in addition to the unlawful wiretapping and possessing a device for wiretapping raps.
Although not specified in the story, I'll go out on a limb and suggest that the reason Truong was hit with the "wiretapping" charges -- I mean other than the fact he allegedly gave the police a hard time -- was that he failed to inform the employees at the dealership that he was tape-recording their conversation. Twelve states, including my beloved Massachusetts, require that all parties to a conversation be informed before anyone can hit the record button on whatever device they're packing or yacking on.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
On Twitter now
Security
Powered by TwitterOn Twitter now
Security
Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers
Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal
Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants
pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal
sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7
claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading
James Gaskin
Learn How To Print Pages In Order with Ink Jet Printers
mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much
Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview
Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
- Ubuntu advances: Why Ubuntu server installations will surge in 2010
- Social media marketing: How to make friends with benefits
- More...
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.






