Microsoft says turn off Windows feature to protect Windows

If you can't fix it, and Microsoft can't, rip it out is Microsoft's advice for Windows' SMB2 bug.

By sjvn  21 comments

There's no real reason for SMB2, (Server Message Block 2), a Microsoft network file and print-sharing protocol that ships with Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008 and Windows 7, to exist. All it does is duplicate the basic network file and print functionality that Windows has provided for over a decade. But, SMB2 is in there, it is broken, and, now it can be used to take over PCs.

Microsoft admits that the problem is real. Mark Wodrich and Jonathan Ness, part of the MSRC (Microsoft Security Response Center) engineering team wrote that an experimental exploit is already out and that it can gain "complete control of the targeted system and can be launched by an unauthenticated user." Just what you didn't need.

There is a way to fix it. Well, sort of. You have to turn SMB2 off. You can do that the hard way, by editing the Windows' registry, or, the easy way, by clicking on this "Fix it" link from a Vista, Server 2008, or pre-RTM versions of Windows 7 PC. But, if you do, and you use SMB2 to connect to network drives or printers, you're also going to lose the ability to use any of them. That will go over big in many businesses.

You can still use network drives and the like with SMB, and, if you're using Server 2003 or earlier servers or Samba servers for sharing files and printers, you're already using the older, more reliable and secure protocol. Only people who've moved entirely to Microsoft's latest and greatest network sharing protocol are in trouble.

If that's you, you should be OK because, by default, Server 2008 should fall back to SMB if SMB2 isn't available. I'd try the fix first on test Vista and Windows 7 PCs before rolling out the fix to all the client PCs. You don't want to start Monday morning, after all, by locking everyone out of their files.

If you're not using SMB2, you should still run the Microsoft 'Fix.' SMB2 is on by default in all three versions of Windows that it used on. Even if you don't use networking at all except to connect to the Internet, you should still turn off SMB2. Chances are your PC firewall-you are running one right?--will stop any attack using SMB2, but why take a chance?

The ironic thing about all this is that the real reason that Microsoft moved to SMB2, according to Wikipedia, is that they wanted a protocol that they didn't have to share with Samba or anyone else. Too bad on their own Microsoft couldn't get it right.

On my own computer network, which includes Vista, Windows 7, and Server 2008, I turn off Microsoft's recent network 'improvements' since they tend to get in the way of connecting with Samba-based servers and NAS (network attached storage) devices and even older versions of Windows. I have yet to see any problems coming from sticking with Windows' older networking protocols.

Microsoft assures users, as usual, that they'll issue a real fix real soon now. I'm not holding my breath. If all goes well you can expect to see a real fix by Patch Tuesday, the first Tuesday of the month, in October.

21 comments

    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Did you mean 'feign'? If it feigns complete control, laptop battery that means it only looks like it has complete control. What on earth are you saying?
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Why does everyone use this for definitions. This is definitions created by people and edited by users. Which does not define properly all items listed. Colleges DO NOT Allow wikipedia at all as it contains no reference section due to the editing features. my question is if you are a reporter, editor, writer or such then why do you use it if others in the professional world don't?? Please get the information from RELIABLE SOURCES as we rely on the information you write to inform us.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Seems we are quick to bash Microsoft when there’s a problem, like them or hate them…all that write software are employed due to this companies success. A competitive market is what keeps us employed and yes there are probably better OS than Microsoft but non as successful. I’ve never met anyone that’s written bug free code; most of my bugs turn up when handing it off for others to use…seems someone always tries using it in a method not thought of (outside the box).So when you come across an issue, point it out and save your energy for productive work. Such as all the nice work found on “The Code Project”, which has helped me out quite a bit.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Because, Windows 7 is yet to Ship in Mid October(Oct 22nd). The RTM version of the software till present doesnt posess this bug. And, i believe you might be pointing out this vulnerability in Public and Pre-Beta builds or in Release candidate build.And, be sure, not to criticize something which hasn't released yet! The Microsoft claims in the RC's software licence agreement itself that "This software is not complete" and it is only for "testing purposes". They also advices the user to "use it at his/her own risk" :-)Anyway, nice timepass.. ;-)-Jithin PG
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    well, the real question is :how many time did spend on writing such a bad article ?please, stay with Linux and don't turn about Microsoft... that's not your cup of tea
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Please tell me this guy doesn't get paid to write this kind of poorly written and unresearched article...My opinion about IT World just went negative.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    I lol'd at this.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    You should clarify this does NOT apply to the Win7 RTM version. Try installing the "fix it" patch on RTM and you get "this fix does not apply to your OS" - and, as stated in the ComputerWorld article you linked to, it applies only to Win7 PREVIEW editions.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    It's like reading the Globe, just with a less plausible story.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    I thought CIFS will be the successor of SMBv1, now, this is one of many articles in theses days where I can read about SMBv2, but none of them mentions CIFS? Is it being abandoned? regards Florian
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Did you mean 'feign'? If it feigns complete control, that means it only looks like it has complete control. What on earth are you saying?
    Anonymous 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    My guess is gain.So much for proof-reading.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Wow, this is the worst-researched article I've read in a long time. Windows 7 and Server 2008 R2 are not affected by this issue, contrary to your article, except for people still using the RC version of Windows 7 32-bit, and that it is really only an issue if you allow untrusted networks to connect to your computer through your firewall. It's a serious bug, but it will be fixed by Microsoft, just like any other. You claim Microsoft can't fix it, and yet you have absolutely no reason to believe that, nor to you back up your assertion with anything.The Wikipedia article you linked to only backs up your statement in one line, marked "citation needed", and then goes on to list the actual benefits of SMBv2, contradicting your thesis. Also, portraying SMBv1 as more secure because a nasty bug was found in SMBv2 is laughable. Do you have any idea how many bugs have been fond in SMBv1 over the years?
    sjvn
    sjvn 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    I observe that instead of a fix, Microsoft is saying to kill the feature for now, and that they will fix it... eventually.Read what Microsoft says and look at what MS does, not what you want Microsoft to have said and to do. Steven
    Anonymous 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    He also misread that it was some other exploit that would not be patched, as well as that exploit for an older operating system, Windows 2000. http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9137714/Microsoft_Patching_Windows_2000_infeasible_The claim is Microsoft still supports Windows 2000 SP4 until July 2010.However, you have no real reason that they would bother fixing it, since they claim that fixing the flaw in Windows 2000 is "infeasible" because it would "break" the product. Would you be so sure that they would fix it with a patch if they found that it would break Vista (even more)?
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Where did all the good engineers go? Retired? Switched to Linux? My favorite part of this article was the "Only people who switched to Microsoft's latest and greatest are vunerable" (paraphrased) The appalling thing is these kinds of "issues" are becoming the Norm with Microsoft it seems: 1: Not fixing Supported OS's because "it's to hard"2: Vista - Completely Awful - Learn how to navigate your computer's file explorer all over again because all the software bloat and "Security" dialogs didn't slow you down enough...3: Latest and greatest OS roll can be compromised by unauthenticated users...Please - stick to making cool Mice, Vibrating Joysticks, DirectX, and Office (which the new UI I didn't find as productive for MSAccess at all) --Jason
    Anonymous 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    The solution to all bad software is to hire cheaper developers.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    C'mon, sjvn!! I like to use Linux, like you. But, at least give reliable sources in your articles--citing Wikipedia for reliable info as to why MS is using SMB2??? I doesn't look too good for a journalist to do this--of course, maybe a columnist isn't a journalist?!?!?!? --Bucky
    Anonymous 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    Lay off the question marks, it makes you look like you are having a seizure.
    Anonymous 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    Can you provide a reliable resource for this?

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      SecurityWhite Papers & Webcasts

      White Paper

      Aberdeen Analyst Insight: Does Your Enterprise Have a Dropbox Problem?

      Without policies, awareness and supported alternatives for sharing files securely, end-users will often overlook security and compliance in favor of getting the job done. Read this whitepaper to determine if your enterprise has a "Dropbox Problem" and ways successful organizations address this problem.

      White Paper

      BYOD: How to Design Secure Usage

      With employee mobile devices springing up throughout your workplace, how can you establish an individual liable usage policy? Use these questions from Good Technology to help prepare your organization.

      White Paper

      Good Technology State of BYOD Report

      New data finds Finance and Healthcare industries dominate BYOD picture and that users are willing to pay device and service plan costs if they can use their own devices. Read More>>

      White Paper

      A Proactive Approach to Server Security

      Learn why security-conscious organizations are taking a more proactive approach to server security. Download this Spire Research whitepaper to understand how you can eliminate the threat caused by today's more advanced threats and protect your organization's most valuable data.

      White Paper

      Protection Against Modern Cybersecurity Threats

      Download this case study to learn how this accounting and consulting giant uses Bit9's adaptive application whitelisting to offer employees flexibility without jeopardizing enterprise safety.

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question