by sjvn
Security

Safe-Guarding Windows 7

Here's what you need to know to make sure that Windows 7 stays safe.

2 comments | 11I like it!
October 22, 2009, 12:35 PM — 

Windows 7 is a lot of good things. It's certainly better, for example, than Vista. But, and this is important, Windows 7 is no more secure than any of its predecessors. Here are the basics of what you need to do to make sure that Windows 7 is as secure as it can be.

First, you almost certainly won't need to buy a firewall program. Windows' built-in firewall has worked well over the last several versions. The new Windows 7 Firewall is better than what we have in the past though.

You can now manage all of your firewall settings, not just the basic ones as you could with Vista via the control panel applet. Windows 7 also now comes with three firewall profiles: Public network, home network or work network. The home network setting is for the use of Windows 7's new take on home peer-to-peer networking: the HomeGroup.

The combination of Windows 7 firewall and HomeGroup makes for a safe and useful home network. It's only real problem is that HomeGroup networking only works with Windows 7 PCs. XP, Vista, Mac, Linux, etc. just won't work with it.

If you're a business network user, though, you'll appreciate that, unlike with Vista or XP, you can now run two firewall profiles at the same time. So, for example, you can let your kids get at the video on your laptop via HomeGroup media-sharing on your home network connection, while keeping the latest spreadsheet from the business server safe from prying eyes on your work network VPN (Virtual Private Network) connection.

That's the good news. The bad news is that, thanks to the less than wonderful Microsoft Security Essentials, you're still going to need an anti-virus program.

If you're moving from XP to Windows 7, you'll have to get and install a new one. In theory, you can move from Vista to Windows 7 without installing a new program. I wouldn't. Anti-virus software tends to be cranky about change at the best of times-as well as it should!-so plan on installing a new anti-viral program right after you finish upgrading.

Which program? Well, while there are many good free anti-viral programs, you can't just grab one and assume it will work on your updated, or your brand new Windows 7 PC for that matter.

For example, I'm sorry to say that my favorite Windows anti-virus program Avira has some trouble on 64-bit Windows 7. The latest version, 9.0 series will install, but, in my experience, its anti-virus library updates are slower than slow. Avira tells me that their anti-virus program will fully support 64-bit Windows 7 soon.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Comments

Windows 7 is better than

Windows 7 is better than Windows 7?
| reply

Circular reference?

First and Second sentence:
How is Windows 7 better than windows 7?
I think you mean Vista.
But then there's the issue of slower boot times in 7.

I tried running it in a virtual machine and wasn't really impressed with it. I hate to say it, but I kind of preferred Vista. Since I don't use M$ operating systems natively, I'm not too concerned though.

Even though 7 does give you three different profiles, they don't really show exactly what they are doing. Naturally I'm suspicious of how secure it really is.
A friend of mine would agree that it is better than Vista though.
| reply
peer-to-peer

Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal

Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants

pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal

sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7

claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading

James Gaskin
Learn How To Print Pages In Order with Ink Jet Printers

mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much

Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Marketplace