FireEye moves quickly to quash Mega-D botnet

By Jeremy Kirk, IDG News Service |  Security Add a new comment

A computer security company known for battling botnets moved last week to try to shut down a persistent spam player.

FireEye, a California company that makes security appliances, had been tracking a botnet called Mega-D or Ozdok. Mega-D, which is a network of hacked computers, has been responsible for sending more than 4 percent of the world's spam, according to M86 Security. Many of the computers that make up Mega-D are infected home PCs.

Mega-D is one of several botnets that have implemented advanced technical measures to ensure its owners don't lose control of the hacked PCs. The hackers use command-and-control servers to issue instructions to the zombie PCs, such as when to run a spam campaign.

In the case of Mega-D, the hacked PCs will look for certain domain names in order to download instructions, wrote Atiq Mushtaq of FireEye on the company's blog. If those domains aren't active -- they are often shut down by ISPs if they're associated with abuse -- Mega-D machines will look for custom DNS (Domain Name System) servers to find live domains.

If that also fails, Mega-D is programmed to generate a random domain name based on the current date and time, Mushtaq wrote. When the hackers register the domain name, the infected machines can visit there to get new instructions.

Mega-D's mechanisms to ensure it stays alive have made it difficult for security companies. "Unless someone is committed enough to pre-register those domains, the bot herders can always come forward and register those domains and take the botnet control back," Mushtaq wrote.

Last Thursday night, FireEye started its assault, contacting ISPs that had machines acting as command-and-control servers for Mega-D. All but four service providers shut down connections for IP addresses used by Mega-D, Mushtaq wrote. FireEye also contacted the registrars that control domain names used for Mega-D.

As a final measure, FireEye registered the auto-generated domain names that infected Mega-D computers would contact if the machines failed to reach other command-and-control nodes.

Mushtaq wrote on Friday that some 264,784 unique IP (Internet Protocol) addresses had contacted FireEye's "sinkhole" server, or a server set up in order to identify infected PCs.

"Data collected from the sinkhole server logs will be used to identify the victim machines," Mushtaq wrote.

It's hoped that ISPs will then contact those subscribers and inform them that they need to run an antivirus scan.

FireEye's efforts, along with the cooperation of ISPs and registrars, appear to have successfully tamed Mega-D, at least temporarily.

On Monday, statistics from M86 Security showed that Mega-D spam had nearly stopped. At one previous point, M86 had seen a single Mega-D infected computer send as many as 15,000 spam messages per hour.

"It clearly shows that it's difficult but not impossible to take down some of the nastiest botnets of the world," Mushtaq wrote.

But the reprieve may not last long. FireEye was pre-empting Mega-D by registering domains the bots would look for, but that process can be never-ending and expensive. If FireEye stops registering domains and the orphaned bots call home, the hackers could upload new code to them to make them more difficult to shut down.

"We are unsure how long we can keep up with these future domains," Mushtaq wrote.

ITworld LIVE

SecurityWhite Papers & Webcasts

Webcast On Demand

Seven Deadly Sins of Cloud Security (Video)

As cloud computing gains popularity, too few people are aware of the security threats that are emerging. In this short video, experts from HP discuss the latest cloud security threats and explain measures to help overcome them. Hear about the seven deadly sins of cloud security and learn how to avoid becoming a victim of poor security in your cloud environment.Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries.

Sponsor: HP & Intel

White Paper

Establishing a Strategy for Database Security is No Longer Optional

The options for securing increasingly valuable databases are very broad and deep, and can be confusing. This research provides an overview of three categories of controls that should be implemented to ensure that enterprise data is protected in the most efficient and effective manner.

White Paper

Database Activity Monitoring Is Evolving

Read the analyst report and learn how you can leverage the core capabilities of a DAP solution for better database security.

White Paper

Protecting Against Database Attacks and Insider Threats: Top 5 Scenarios

Read this new eBook to learn the top five scenarios and essential best practices for preventing database attacks and insider threats.

Webcast On Demand

Distributed Database Security with Real-time Monitoring

View this demo and learn how IBM InfoSphere Guardium database activity monitoring can help protect your sensitive data in distributed DBMS environments with a holistic approach to data security and compliance.

Sponsor: IBM

See more White Papers | Webcasts

Ask a question

Ask a Question