Five reasons Google Chrome OS Security Wins

Chrome OS' reliance on a password is a major security problem, but in other ways it has great security. Here's why.

By sjvn  5 comments

Google's Chrome OS has many virtues. Based on a solid foundation of Ubuntu Linux, it uses the Chrome Web browser as its interface to any and all applications. Chrome OS is also not so much a Windows replacement, as it's an attempt to get rid of the entire traditional idea of a PC desktop. If Google is successful with this, one big reason will be its vastly improved security.

Before I go into why Chrome OS will be much more secure than Windows, I have to point out that Google has one big, honking huge security problem to fix first: it's reliance on the fatally flawed login/password model. If they can beat that problem, then Chrome is likely to be most secure 'desktop' operating system we'll have ever seen. Here's why.

First, Google accepts that it's impossible to make an absolutely secure operating system. They use a phrase to describe this design philosophy that I think every developer should have tattooed on their hands: "The perfect is the enemy of the good." In other words, Google won't waste its time on trying to find some perfect system that only exists in fantasy. Instead, Google is spending time on making the best practical security system. This is how it plays out.

1. Harden the operating system

Chrome developers are using a variety of Linux security techniques to minimize how much system access any given program will have and to reduce the number of exposed attack surfaces. In addition, Chrome OS is adopting a defense in depth (PDF Link) approach. The core idea here is that you use multiple layers of security so even if someone breaks in at one point, they're faced with yet another security barrier.

Google is using multiple methods to harden Chrome, but I'm going to glance at just two here. One, namespaces (PDF Link) is rather old. The other, cgroups (Control Groups), is quite new, but the pair have similar goals. In each, the idea is to isolate a hierarchical collection of tasks, cgroups, or a set of processes, and process trees, namespaces, from unlimited access to the system.

So, using both techniques, when an application runs on Chrome its processes gets only as much access to the operating system as it needs to do its job. If the program doesn't need say to use the local file system, then it won't be able to read or write to files. You get the idea, by strictly limiting, what any given application can do to the over-all system that makes it that much harder for even a successful attack on a program to do much harm to the computer, the operating system, or other programs.

2. Sandboxing the operating system

All of the above makes it easier for Google to create an operating system where as many processes and operations as possible are 'sandboxed' from each other. Sandboxing is a common security technique and you often see it used in Web applets and the like. With Chrome, Google takes sandboxing to a new level.

For example, in future versions of Chrome OS say you have two Web pages up. One is a secured Web page that uses SSL (secure socket layer) to secure its Internet connection and the other is an ordinary Web page. On other operating systems you use the same TCP/IP network stack to access both of them. Not on Chrome OS you won't. Instead, each gets its own separate stack. So, even if a successful attack is made on the plain-Jane network stack, nothing happens to the secured link.

This is in stark contrast with Windows where application and process interoperability trumps security every time. Chrome OS will have program interoperability. Instead of doing it as Windows does at a low level, Chrome OS relies on mid-level IPC (interprocess communication) mechanisms), such as D-Bus and ICCCM (Inter-Client Communication Conventions Manual) and on higher, application level mechanisms such as those provided by HTML 5 for safer application and process interoperability.

3. Locking down the file systems

OpenBSD is generally regarded as the most secure general purpose operating system out of the box. Chrome OS will give it a run for its money though when it comes to file systems. In Chrome OS, everything that can be locked down in the file system is locked down.

Like what? For starters, the root partition, where software lives on Linux systems, is read-only. You can't add a program to it even if you tried. Oh, and your home directory? Where you keep your files and settings? You can't put executable files or device drivers there either. When Google said that all Chrome OS applications would be Web applications, they weren't kidding.

Oh, and if something is wrong with the data from a Web application? The plan is to minimize the damage from poisoned data by restricting data from each Web domain to its own local storage and then controlling access to that data at a process level. Here again we see the idea of sandboxing to prevent attacks from spreading making its appearance.

4. Secured, automatic updates

An eternal problem with most operating systems is that if a user doesn't choose to update the system, they're vulnerable to the very next attack to come down the road. Or, even more annoying, you can be stuck patching and patching again until the vendor gets it right.

With Chrome OS that's not a problem. You turn on your computer and it gets the newest patches. Something goes wrong with your computer? The entire operating system is replaced with the latest patches included. A new zero-day exploit comes out? Chrome OS auto-updates to fix it as soon as possible rather than waiting for the next monthly Patch Tuesday.

5. Verified boot

Do you know if your computer is secure when you boot it up? Probably not. But, you will with Chrome OS. Every time you start a Chrome OS based device, it will check first its firmware and then start checking its core programs for unauthorized changes as you start using the system. If it finds any, it will tell you about a potential security problem and how to restore the system to a new, good version of the operating system.

No fuss, no muss, and from what I can see of the design it looks like it will also put a real road-block even in the way of a cracker who had stolen your device and is trying to break into it.

All-in-all, Google Chrome OS security is outstanding... once you get pass that login/password problem. If Google can come up with a fix for that, then we may well be looking at the more secure desktop operating system that's ever showed up.

5 comments

    Anonymous 2 years ago
    quote:"I find the options n preferences menu in Chrome completely rubbish…I mean they hardly give you any options with just the three tabs…Opera gives you 5, Firefox and IE give you 7 or 8…"Google takes simplicity a priority. What use of more options when the options in a "web-enabled" app are unlimited? Chrome was designed to run a web-app, not to overwhelm you with unnecessary options in the preferences menu.Quote""and its not like the Chrome developers have been working overtime to give you sleek UI’s, … just try setting up a proxy to connect to a network in Chrome and it simply switches to the IE settings menu…that’s original! "That's the Google Chrome version in Windows. It is a simple concept. Google Chrome browser was using the default proxy setting in Windows, unless if the proxy server is required to connect to networks. So, I think it requires a little effort for the developers to just point the proxy to the Windows default setting rather than to create their own.Quote:And cmon...consider how carelessly they’ve built their Chrome browser… I heard it only catches around 65% of all threats caught by IE 8! Lots of work required on the safety front. "And the evidence? The last time I've heard from black hat, the most difficult to hack was the chrome browser. So, we need your evidence.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    I find the options n preferences menu in Chrome completely rubbish…I mean they hardly give you any options with just the three tabs…Opera gives you 5, Firefox and IE give you 7 or 8…and its not like the Chrome developers have been working overtime to give you sleek UI’s, … just try setting up a proxy to connect to a network in Chrome and it simply switches to the IE settings menu…that’s original! And cmon...consider how carelessly they’ve built their Chrome browser… I heard it only catches around 65% of all threats caught by IE 8! Lots of work required on the safety front.
    mburton325
    mburton325 2 years ago
    Lets take this point by point1. Harden the Operating System: If it wasn't so pathetic I would probably laugh. A) Since the majority of the operating system will be housed on a server that is running a Operating System to server up Chrome OS it now lows a single point of attack for multiple netbooks running Chrome OS. Chrome OS is for a Net Appliance there for the only real instructions during boot are to point the net book at the server to get the Operating System to run the netbook.B)Since google uses Apache and Linux to run their servers it doesn't take rocket since to figure out how to avoid any security set by Google. Linux and Apache source code is freely available and anyone with enough knowledge of C++ will be able to read it and find the security holes. 2. Sandboxing the Operating System: Yes very effective security except it is used in conjunction with other security steps such as firewalls, user access control list, antivirus protection and other security appliances on the market. Sandboxing with in itself does not work.3. Locking down the file system: If the first two points can be compromised what good does this do? And there is also the point that all it takes to get around the security of the Lock down is to hack GRUB and change the password. Something that is typcially taught in intro to Linux classes because some student forgets their password.4.Secured and Automatic Updates: This is the only one I will agree with. Since the Main structure of the OS resides in the cloud therefore a server they can run updates while the user is offline. Actually probably the best idea for Chrome OS.5. Verified Boot: This is actually quite funny. The hardware only knows what it is being told and since bios loads before the Operating System, and in the case of Chrome will probably point the netbook/pc at the server to load the operating system what is it going to verify?Finally the entire article once again reads like a Linux fanboy cheer then an actual IT article. Outside of writing about technology and such I did not see anywhere in your bio where you have the expertise in the IT field. Do everyone a favor and go talk to the people that actually have a science degree in computers before writing fanboy cheers.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    > as it's an attempt to get rid of the entire traditional idea of a PC desktop.It seems to me that this does not get even close to what can or will happen.ChromeOS, and others that are similar, does not get rid of the 'desktop' so much as make it portable. While one can use, say, Google as the 'cloud' for running applications there is no need for this. Consider Opera Unite where the browser is used on the desktop machine to access applications and it can serve these to others. By combining a desktop machine with a netbook that attaches back to your own desktop from anywhere in the world you will have both while maintaining control over your own data.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    But with netbook prices and bullet proof security... sounds like a winner.The login/password problem is difficult because the only solution is unpleasant long passwords.Google will see this as a bar to adoption.They could refuse dictionary words and phrases under 12 characters (maybe with a nice wizard that alters your phrase to make it better) but it would annoy a lot of users who would just use a post-it note or not use the service at all.This also does not stop phishing.

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      SecurityWhite Papers & Webcasts

      White Paper

      Overcome Top 7 Admin Challenges of Active Directory

      As Active Directory's role in the enterprise has drastically increased, so has the need to secure the data. Gain insight on creating repeatable, enforceable processes that reduces administrative overhead and enables robust, customizable reporting and auditing capabilities. Brought to you by NetIQ.

      White Paper

      Insiders Can Ruin Your Company. Take Action.

      Did you know that 80 percent of threats to an organization come from the inside? The threat from insiders is often overlooked in organizations worldwide. This white paper from NetIQ, discusses key technology solutions that help to prevent and detect insider threats.

      White Paper

      Top Solutions and Tools to Prevent Devastating Malware

      Custom malware frequently goes undetected. According to Forrester Research, the best way to reduce risk of breach is to deploy file integrity monitoring (FIM) tools that provide immediate alerts. This white paper has been brought to you by NetIQ, the leader in solving complex IT challenges.

      White Paper

      Streamline Compliance and Increase ROI

      Streamline, simplify, and automate compliance related activities; especially those that impact multiple business units. This white paper from NetIQ, outlines solutions that will help your business gain the maximum return on investment possible while aligning your compliance programs.

      White Paper

      X-Ray of the PCI Process-4 Proactive Steps

      This white paper from Forrester Research Inc., helps break PCI into understandable components. Security and risk professionals will gain knowledge and insight into creating a compliant and secure IT environment. Follow these four proactive steps now before your next audit. Brought to you by NetIQ.

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question