The IE Fix is in

First, the good news, Microsoft's fixed the IE bug used to attack Google. The bad news: the bug had been known for months.

By sjvn  13 comments

I still think that the safest thing you can do about your Web browsing habits is to switch from IE (Internet Explorer) to Firefox or some other browser. But, if you're wedded to IE 7 or 8 -- please, please stop using IE 6--Microsoft has made a fix available for all versions of IE. If you're reading this and you haven't upgraded your copy of IE yet, do yourself a favor, do it now. I'll wait for you.

OK, using updated IE or some other browser now? Good. Now, for the bad news, it turns out that Microsoft knew about this critical bug since last August!.

Some people are making excuses for Microsoft that five months isn't too long for them to fix this, and seven other serious IE bugs. Please. Give me a break. Serious security bugs are found and fixed in open-source software in days or weeks. Why should Microsoft get a free pass?

In its last reported quarter, Microsoft had a net profit of more than 3.5-billion dollars. Is it too much to ask for that they spend more of that on patch programming and quality assurance?

But, what worries me far more than Microsoft's tardy ways when it comes to fixing major problems is that a relatively unknown bug was used in the attack. Usually, criminal hackers are a lazy lot. They wait until some security researcher or the other reveals a security hole, and then they attack it. Or, more likely still, they wait until a company announces a patch for a known security hole, and then they jump on it.

In other words, they're not really hackers at all. They just have a bag of trick attacks that they deploy once someone else has shown them the way to a security hole. That's why it's so important to patch your software the second a fix is available. It's that brief period between when a security hole is fixed and most users have patched it that the crooks have their best chance to corrupt the most PCs.

That wasn't the case here though. This time, someone, Google claims the Chinese government, worked on a very successful attack before the security hole was publicly acknowledged, much less fixed.

This indicates to me those China-based hackers, or some other group that's not made up of lazy crooks, is now turning their attention to exploiting Windows' myriad security holes. This is bad, bad news.

In the past, if you kept your Windows and its software up to date with patches and used security software, you were relatively safe. Now, now I'm not so sure.

It also makes me worry about Linux and Mac OS X. Yes, they're both inherently more secure than Windows, but that doesn't mean they're perfectly safe. They're not. No computer operating system is. They're just much harder to attack. But, if some large, well-funded group with technical savvy is now working on not just exploiting security holes, but finding them, then it makes sense for all of us, no matter what we're running on our computers, to be much more cautious. Be careful folks. It's getting ever more dangerous out there on the Web.

13 comments

    Anonymous 1 year ago
    Honestly, it is really sad just how many people use IE, and continue to use IE. With so many other options out there, it is almost frustrating to see people so vulnerable to bugs and other issues, and yet they continue to use the same problematic program.It's like somebody who suffers from the worst apnea symptoms, and knows they suffer from them, but yet they do nothing to change their routine.
    Anonymous 1 year ago
    It's funny you mentioned IE6. It blows my mind how many people still use it. Yet no joke, I actually work at a company where we're still required to use the browser. It's unreal how it works. Not fixing your internet browser is like owning pottery barn pillows and never replacing them, despite the fact that they have visible holes.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Who is responsible if compromised users get their ID stolen because of these grossly neglected & unpatched exploits? ...Microsoft! ...UH-UH, wrong answer, ...it's the user! So... if YOUR computer gets compromised, and YOU'RE ID gets stolen, it's YOUR own fault!Choose your alliances v.carefully!
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    A view without the SJVN agenda.http://www.itworld.com/internet/93816/firefox-36-is-good-but-ie-8-stronger-key-areas
    Anonymous 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    This is a valid view? Why? Because an MBA who ran some marketing departments and now runs an "independent" security assessment company did a study and says so? Or is it because maybe you use IE and want to feel better about it? Or is it because it takes absolutely no brains to get suckered in to socially engineered malware and IE protects you from that?
    Anonymous 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    You guys are so laughable, you don't like the report so you want to change the focus to IE being tied to the OS and ignore the rest, such BS.Once a hacker is in through anything any piece of software he has access to everything you do, can you wrap your narrow mined brains around this? Everything!!! And since the hacker is smarter than you are, he/she will probably get even greater access. No software is impervious to a determined hacker.
    Anonymous 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    Great, a pro-MS agenda instead :P
    Anonymous 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    they report about what others tested last year with FF 3.0.11 and they tested for socialy engineered malware. This is something a user with open eyes could avoid without the help of software.SJVN is right that we should never feel safe, even in my case where I don't have the choice to use Internetexplorer, it's just not available for any of the eight platforms I use :)
    Anonymous 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    Why has it taken Microsoft so long to catch up? How is it that a scrappy little Open Source company kicked Microsoft's butt in security, ease-of-use and real innovation? What does Microsoft do with all that money? They can't possibly be using much of it to make better products. I look at how long Microsoft has been doing what it is they do. I look at how much money they have. I look at how much influence they wield. I look at their effective monopoly. Yet Microsoft is getting their head handed to them in so many markets. Go ahead and tell me how successful they are. Go ahead. No matter how successful you say they are, it's not enough. They should be King of the World.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Actually, I think I agree with you. They are halfway good for an OS. But only halfway. Their Mobile OS's suck out loud. And as far as servers, they don't even eat their own dog food. They run BSD servers - and charge customers untold millions per year for server licenses for systems that they themselves won't use because they *don't* just fsck-ing work.As far as Browsers, Firefox isn't really w3c compliant either, just WAY better than IE. I haven't checked, but Chrome might be.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Yet another MS screwup! It's quite a shame that this large company can't perform up to standards, and more so that we allowed them, and keep on allowing them, control of our electronic properties.IMOA, the only thing MS is half way good for is operating systems. We designers curse the fact that we need to employ our own bugs in web copy in order for pages to display the same for IE users.And even when IE comes out with a new version, they still haven't gotten it right! Their MAIN website, microsoft.com brings up over 390 errors from W3C.org!Microsoft, you need to get your act straight!!Internet users, you need to get Firefox!!

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      SecurityWhite Papers & Webcasts

      White Paper

      Overcome Top 7 Admin Challenges of Active Directory

      As Active Directory's role in the enterprise has drastically increased, so has the need to secure the data. Gain insight on creating repeatable, enforceable processes that reduces administrative overhead and enables robust, customizable reporting and auditing capabilities. Brought to you by NetIQ.

      White Paper

      Insiders Can Ruin Your Company. Take Action.

      Did you know that 80 percent of threats to an organization come from the inside? The threat from insiders is often overlooked in organizations worldwide. This white paper from NetIQ, discusses key technology solutions that help to prevent and detect insider threats.

      White Paper

      Top Solutions and Tools to Prevent Devastating Malware

      Custom malware frequently goes undetected. According to Forrester Research, the best way to reduce risk of breach is to deploy file integrity monitoring (FIM) tools that provide immediate alerts. This white paper has been brought to you by NetIQ, the leader in solving complex IT challenges.

      White Paper

      Streamline Compliance and Increase ROI

      Streamline, simplify, and automate compliance related activities; especially those that impact multiple business units. This white paper from NetIQ, outlines solutions that will help your business gain the maximum return on investment possible while aligning your compliance programs.

      White Paper

      X-Ray of the PCI Process-4 Proactive Steps

      This white paper from Forrester Research Inc., helps break PCI into understandable components. Security and risk professionals will gain knowledge and insight into creating a compliant and secure IT environment. Follow these four proactive steps now before your next audit. Brought to you by NetIQ.

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question