Sun adds muscle to Niagara server line

By James Niccolai, IDG News Service |  Data Center/Servers, enterprise, Sun Add a new comment

Sun Microsystems has doubled the capacity of its Niagara servers with the four-socket Sparc Enterprise T5440 system, designed for running corporate databases and ERP (enterprise resource planning) applications.

The server houses up to four of Sun's UltraSparc T2 Plus processors, up from two in the previous model, and expands the main memory to a maximum 512G bytes. Each processor has eight cores that can each run eight computing threads, or sets of software instructions, simultaneously. The servers are also sold by Sun partner Fujitsu.

Sun has positioned earlier Niagara servers primarily for network-facing applications or Web-tier work, but the newer machines are powerful enough to run large OLTP (online transaction processing) databases and packaged software from the likes of Oracle and SAP, said Rick Hetherington, the CTO of Sun's Microelectronics Group.

"I wouldn't recommend this for a Web server, it would be a little bit of an overkill," he said.

The support for larger memory configurations also makes the T5440 good for virtualization and server consolidation, Hetherington said. The machines come standard with Sun's Solaris 10 OS and its Solaris Containers and Logical Domains virtualization software.

At US$45,000, the entry price is almost three times that of the two-socket T5420 launched in April. Sun said that's because the base configuration of the T5440 is more powerful and qualifies it as a "midrange" server. It includes two 1.2GHz T2 Plus processors, 32G bytes of memory and two 146G byte hard disks.

Sun has taken a different track from competitors with its processor designs. The T2 keeps the clockspeed low -- a maximum of 1.4GHz per core, compared with 5GHz for IBM's Power6 -- but can process more threads simultaneously and includes on-chip memory controllers to keep the threads filled with data.

IBM refreshed its own Unix server line last week, and Sun and IBM both claimed to give the best performance and power efficiency. Dan Olds, principle analyst at Gabriel Consulting Group, said it depends how the servers will be used.

"Customers need to test these systems on a workload-by-workload basis," he said. "There aren't many general rules of thumb here. It's going to vary by what you are doing and the application."

The Niagara servers seem to be doing well for Sun, which has otherwise lost share in the server market. Sun said its revenue from Niagara systems increased 84 percent in the year ending June 30, accounting for $1.1 billion in business.

Jean Bozman, a research vice president with IDC, said one advantage of the T2 systems is that they can run applications that were developed for earlier Sparc servers. "That's good news for customers," she said.

    Add a comment

    Post a comment using one of these accounts
    Or join now
    At least 6 characters

    Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
    Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
    The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

    ITworld LIVE

    Data Center/ServersWhite Papers & Webcasts

    White Paper

    AppAssure vs Backup Exec

    In this new Lab Report, openBench Labs examines AppAssure backup and replication software v4.7 with Symantec Backup Exec 2010 R2. AppAssure implements changed-block tracking technology to provide data protection for both virtual and physical servers in specific OS environments. In contrast, Backup Exec 2010 R2 uses traditional file-based backup to promote compatibility with the largest number of operating systems.

    White Paper

    AppAssure vs Acronis

    In this study of data protection for environments with virtual and physical servers running Windows, openBench Labs tested AppAssure Backup and Replication software v 4.7 and Acronis Backup & Recovery 11. Both solutions utilize block-based technology to unify data protection operations.

    White Paper

    Top 5 Requirements for Backup of Virtual and Physical Servers - Greg Shields, Microsoft MVP

    Reports by leading industry analysts like Gartner, IDC and Concentrated Technology suggest virtual servers in 2011 will eclipse physical servers in total server deployments. The majority of today's business computing environments already have both virtual and physical servers at the same time.

    White Paper

    Guaranteeing 100% Backup Recovery

    The single biggest challenge for IT personnel involved in the data protection process is making sure that their backups are recoverable every time. Management and users won't remember the ninety-nine successful recoveries but they will always remember the one failure.

    White Paper

    Lab Report - Optimizing VM Backup for VMware and Hyper-V

    Data centers are becoming more difficult to manage and protect as more data and applications are moved into virtual environments. Adding fuel to the fire, CIOs must now deal with corporate mandates to build an IT infrastructure that scales to unknown demand levels and provides service assurance for fluctuating conditions that cannot be accurately projected. The solution is a transition to a private cloud characterized by a hypervisor-independent Virtual Infrastructure (VI).

    See more White Papers | Webcasts

    Ask a question

    Ask a Question