This isn't a rigorous benchmarked lab test yet, but I found something bizarre this morning. After fixing a little router problem, I tested the download speeds on my DSL line from AT&T and my cable Internet line from Time Warner Cable. I have both for product testing needs.
My DSL is pretty low speed, officially about 1000 kilo bits per second on download and 256 kilo bits per second upload. Testing that with my new (and still aggravating) Vista machine on the Bandwidth.com test meter, I got 1223 kpbs download and 321 kbps upload. That's about normal.
Then I tested my Time Warner cable connection on my primary work machine running Ubuntu 8.04. My cable modem connection is always much faster than my DSL by a factor of 10 on the download speeds. I forget what Time Warner's latest promises are for download speeds, but I think it's 10 mega bits per second to 12 mbps. Upload speeds are throttled down to 1mbps.
My Ubuntu machine returned a rating from the Bandwidth.com test of 22-25mbps over several tests. That's darn fast today, faster than normal. Then I did the same test from a Windows XP PC and got results from 12-14mbps. Still fast, but not nearly as fast as the Ubuntu machine.
The two computers are almost identical: both off-lease Compaq small form factor D515s, part of the very popular corporate desktop D500 family. Both have Pentium 4 processors running at 2GHz. The Ubuntu machine has 768MB of RAM, while the XP box has only 512MB of RAM. Both run Firefox 3 as their browser.
Can a little extra RAM make that much difference in Internet download speeds? I don't think so. Sure, more RAM helps, but can it add 7-10mbps to your download speed? No. That makes me think that Ubuntu handles networking faster than Windows XP.
If you have both operating system in your company, running on comparable PCs, try the test yourself. It could be I got some random weirdness, but I tested the two systems back and forth for seven iterations for good luck. There's a big difference in my two systems. Let me know how much difference you find.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers
Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal
Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants
pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal
sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7
claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading
James Gaskin
Learn How To Print Pages In Order with Ink Jet Printers
mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much
Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview
Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
- Ubuntu advances: Why Ubuntu server installations will surge in 2010
- Social media marketing: How to make friends with benefits
- More...
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.
Kinda Pointless
They're different machines with different configurations.Case Closed???
Next time use a SINGLE machine and test a default install of XP (SP3) and Ubuntu. THEN it might be worthwhile. But even to taht,....a web based flash program to verify something as complex as TCP/IP?
Weak.
Network cards and drivers?
A few ways to improve this test:1) Configuration
Are you running both with the same network card? If so is it the current driver in both cases? Any other devices or services that may differ? Are you connecting via a router, or directly to the MODEM?
2) System activity
Was Windows downloading updates at the time? Was the network otherwise idle in both cases?
3) Variation with time
Did you try swapping back to the Linux machine and seeing if it was still running that much faster? Have you tried just tossing a coin and then running the speed test on the machine chosen?
what browser?
My guess is that bandwidth.com's benchmark code is not functioning properly on Ubuntu and/or whatever browser you used.Try a different browser on the Ubuntu machine.
Failing that, stage a large-ish (compressed) file somewhere, then download it using ftp onto each machine, using the Time Warner connection for each test.