Windows 7 Nonsense Gets Sillier

By James Gaskin  10 comments

Various writers and bloggers are all atwitter about Microsoft's new “guidance on Windows deployments for business customers,” a blog from a member of the Windows Product Management team. Amazingly, after sympathizing with customers worried about budgets and upgrading PCs and software, the advice from this Microsoft blog is: send us more money NOW!

Here's the “logic” in the blog, as much as I can tell. Everyone wants to go to Windows 7 because we're sure Microsoft won't lay two OS eggs in a row (my interpretation, not the blogger's). But since Windows 7 is very much like Vista, go ahead and upgrade to Vista so it will be easier to get to Windows 7. That assumes Windows 7 actually improves upon Vista. I'm not taking that as a fact until I see it for myself.

That's the new blog message. Let me summarize: buy some of our new junk now! Buy Vista or early Windows 7, but hurry up and stop using XP, older computers, older peripherals, and older software.

Standard FUD statements are included, like “talk to your application vendors to find out how long they intend to provide support for their applications running in Windows XP...” The next phrase is the kicker. “...and when they plan to support their application running in Windows 7.”

Isn't that part of the problem with Vista? Software by the boatload that works great on XP died on Vista, and updates dribbled slowly. Vista got a black eye, and companies that trusted Microsoft and jumped right away to Vista got two black eyes: the hassle of upgrading and the cost of new equipment.

Fascinating that MSFT had to include a paragraph specifically for Windows 2000 users. What have those W2K users been thinking all this time by skipping XP and Vista? Maybe getting their work done rather than jumping through Microsoft hoops to no business advantage?

See if I'm crazy, but something seems very, very wrong. Microsoft has been telling us Windows 7 will run on all the hot little netbooks vendors are making as fast as possible. Now they're telling us Windows 7 is just like Vista in all manner of important ways. Since Vista can't run on netbooks, why does anyone believe the Microsoft hype that Windows 7 will run on those netbooks?

10 comments

    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Got it running (Windows 7) on a Dell Dimension 1100 with 512 ram and it ran with a performance hit but very usable.I am guessing with a little more ram maybe just 1 gb (total) this should run great.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    I installed the beta on an OLD OLD OLD test box that I have laying around (get this: 800MHz with 512M RAM!!) just to see how awful it could get and guess what? It ran really good....installed without a hitch and only had the ugly UAC pop up ONCE and a simple click YES and it went away. It did not find my soundcard (no shock) but I simple went in and told it to update the drivers and it found them just fine...not sure why it didn't do that initially during install but oh well.....Anyway I spend most of my time bashing M$ but SO FAR the W7 beta worked unbelievably well for me....
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    I think the issue here is that MS is telling users not to skip Vista. They flat out say go out and buy it even if you plan on buying Windows 7 when it comes out. So what it comes down to is MS trying to sell more Vista licenses before they ship Windows 7. Why on earth would anyone want to buy Vista now and then pay more to get Windows 7 in a few more months.I've never been an early adopter. MS usually takes at least one service pack to get the bugs worked out. Look at XP, it wasn't as good as it is now until they patched a few things.Windows 7 as is runs decently on netbooks, yes he said netbooks not notebooks. The problem will be with cost. The increased cost of a full version of W7 and not the cut down starter edition will make netbooks to pricey. As I said in my own post Is Windows a viable OS for netbooks, netbooks are popular because they are ultra affordable ultra portable, however when you bump the cost by another $100 then they tend to loose some of that appeal.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    XP is an outdated OS. Stop living in the past. If you actually used Vista you'd see that the vast majority of what is said about it is untrue.I actually like the new Windows 7 taskbar and the way it manages open programs. I wish I could run Microsoft, because I'd make even better changes that would really knock people's socks off.Windows 2000 is a poopy OS.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    The author is writing the article from a perspective of someone who has not tried Windows 7 and is having questions as to why he should trust Microsoft this go around. This will be a good percentage of customers. Microsoft will be relying on word of mouth from REAL users to sell this product, so they better get it right.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    i run vista on my notebook...what do you mean it wont run on a notebook?PIN: 24A0846E
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    How can you write this article without even testing Windows 7. It is available for free, and you can easily see it is much better than Vista. I don't see why you can down talk it when you haven't given it a chance. I had many drivers that would not work in vista, or work all of the time, and as soon as I installed Windows 7, bingo, everything works fine. I don't see why people wouldn't want to spend more money on a new OS if they know it is worth it, and they can see for themselves for free, by downloading the beta!
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    I installed Windows 7 beta on a Gateway M405 laptop with 512RAM, I like it!
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    I installed windows 7 on acer aspire one with no problem, and it ran only slightly slower than xp, but with full aero 3d enabled. Can't complain, windows 7 is definetly an improvement over vista as far as performance is concerned. Also, I was able to use windows XP drivers in windows 7 that don't work under windows vista, so I can actually use stuff that works in windows xp, and not in vista.

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      Small BusinessWhite Papers & Webcasts

      White Paper

      Microsoft Volume Licensing Comparison - Small/Med. Business

      This quick-reference document lets small and medium organizations (i.e. those with five or more devices) to easily compare the available Microsoft Volume Licensing programs to create a simple, cost-effective and flexible way to benefit from volume licensing.

      White Paper

      ESG: Oracle Database Appliance: A Simple, Economical Option for SMBs and Independent Software Vendors

      Read this technology overview of a DBMS built for SMBs that provides a rapidly-deployable, highly-available platform at an affordable cost

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question