Small business

Open Source + Amazon Storage = Less Backup Cost

February 17, 2009, 01:32 PM — 

Let's be honest: half of the companies reading this today are NOT backing up their data properly. That's the optimistic figure, because some backup industry analysts say about two-thirds of companies have backup issues that cause them grief. But there's hope for the unprepared half or two-thirds of you out there.

Enter a new player in small and medium business backup, Zmanda. They mashed together two money-saving tools to drop the costs of online backup lower than most of their competitors. By adding open source backup software with the storage infrastructure of Amazon's S3, they multiply savings. You can use some Zmanda products to backup locally, but I strongly (repeat, strongly) recommend you also save a copy of all data offsite as well.

Chander Kant, Zmanda CEO, said via e-mail that using Amazon as a storage back-end works better for customers than some of the bigger names in online storage. Why? “We protect your data to a public storage cloud with openly published APIs to access the data, and store your data in open formats. So, as long as you have your credentials you will be always able to recover your data, regardless of whether you have Zmanda's software running or not.”

Kant describes his small business customers as those with 1-10 servers being backed up, and medium sized customers as those with up to 250 servers. Sounds OK to me, although if your company has 250 servers I'm calling you a large company.

Software for local backup servers and clients are available on an annual subscription basis. That makes acquisition costs pretty low compared to many of their competitors. Software to backup clients of all operating systems, and specialized servers like Microsoft Exchange and SQL Server, are all available on an annual subscription basis. Less out of pocket expenses may persuade some of you backup gamblers to start protecting your ass...ets.

Prices for online storage follow the less expensive model as well. Unlike some providers that charge dollars per stored gigabyte and assess transfer fees as well, Zmanda charges 20 cents per GB with no transfer fees. There goes your argument that online backup is too expensive.

Do we really need another backup provider? After all, there are hundreds out there already.

I say yes, because there are still millions of small businesses rolling the dice every day with their data. Maybe I should make a pair of “Data Dice” for companies who think they'll never lose data. Instead of one dot, I'll put “Data Loss” on one face of each die. If you've ever rolled the dice, you know snake eyes comes up sooner or later. Seeing “Data Loss” rather than snake eyes should make the point quite well.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Comments

http://cloudberrylab.com/

Thanks for the article! If someone wants to explorer Amazon S3 I would recommend CloudBerry Explorer for Amazon s3. It will help you to copy your files to S3. It supports most of the Amazon S3 and CloudFront features and It is a FREEWARE
http://cloudberrylab.com/ (works only on Windows). I hope the author and the readers of this article will find it useful.
| reply

I have been making online

I have been making online file backups for about a year now and I love it! It should be said, the initial backup can take days but once this has been done the software works quietly in the background. It feels so much safer when you know there is an off-site data backup.
| reply
peer-to-peer

Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal

Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants

pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal

sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7

claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading

mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much

Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Marketplace