The Netbook OS Three-Way Chess Match

By James Gaskin  10 comments

It's been fascinating to watch the three-way chess match between Linux operating system vendors, Microsoft, and netbook hardware vendors. Business schools may study this product creation and development for both the great moves (low cost mini-laptops that provide just enough horsepower for a large group of mobile users) and the power of entrenched vendors to control emerging markets.

Let's agree that “netbooks” are small form factor laptops that cost $500 or less and have screens about 10 inches wide (diagonally) or less. We could mandate more technical details, such as CPU, battery, and storage levels, but most people are seduced by the small size and small price, not the Atom central processor. Some of these units with small screens are down into the $200 range, which is remarkable, but those are the ones with 8.9 inch screens.

The original unit, the ASUS Eee, arrived with a small, solid state hard drive of 8GBs and the 8.9 inch screen. These ran a customized version of Linux. Since Asus had been just a parts provider, not complete computer builder, they didn't have a contract with Microsoft. Plus, with the meager horsepower of the original system, using Linux provided better performance and kept users from loading up the tiny machines with huge, processor-intensive programs like PhotoShop.

At the time, XP was officially being put out to pasture by Microsoft, so the Linux option looked like it may actually sell new Linux systems to people who'd never heard of the OS but wanted the small size and price. Here's where the entrenched can clobber the emerging: Microsoft allowed their PC partners like HP, Acer, and Lenovo to use Windows XP rather than Vista. This meant the most popular Windows operating system became the OS of choice on the hottest new hardware form factor. The news today? Microsoft has extended XP support and availability until 2011, so netbook vendors can rest easy and not have to move to Windows 7.

ASUS first controlled the chess board with their innovative hardware using a customized Linux operating system. Traditional PC vendors jumped in with their huge manufacturing and distribution advantage. Many even offered a Linux version initially, but customers, unfamiliar with Linux, wanted their familiar Windows OS. Microsoft then jumped in with XP, an OS that cost less in dollars and in hardware resources than Vista.

Results? ASUS Eee PC now comes with XP options on almost every model, but the sales momentum is swinging to larger, more established PC vendors. So far, entrenched hardware and software makers are winning this chess match. It may be over, or the emerging players in our three-sided chess match may have some strong moves left. Let's hope so, because this has been fun to watch, and provided a new product segment that's been the only hardware bright spot for consumers and vendors alike the past year.

10 comments

    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Most Linux flavors have a sophisticated graphic interface which is quite intuitive, pleasant to use and usually much more than what you get with Windows.http://www.electrocomputerwarehouse.com/
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    I have used the original eeePC 701 (linux) , Acer aspire one (linpus linux), and a newer acer aspire one woth ubuntu netbook remix. The experience couldn´t be better. Mr. Criley´s experience was due to him trying to use the netbook as a notebook, and worse, as a windows one. The reason-to-exist of netbooks is portability for executing simple most used tasks such as browsing the net, writing documents, using spreadsheets, presentations, and some simlpe gaming. If that is the scoop, the linux netbook is faster, simpler to use, cheaper and safer. Now if you intend to add a myriad of applications and try to run windows programs you are set for trouble and that is what happened. As a note, to use the command line is optional in most modern linux distributions.R-dish
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    It depends somewhat which age/experience group is buying netbooks. Youngsters should have a positive learning experience by going say for a netbook with Ubuntu 9.04. I have it running in VirtualBox on an iMac, and am most impressed!My first reaction to Mike's post though was a certain sympathy - I spent a year or two with Gentoo, having passed through a lot of other distros on the way, so I do have some experience with Linux - but looking at things from a more mature (all right, older..) person's point of view, it can fast become confusing when things don't work! ("teach old dogs new tricks")I suspect MS will shoot themselves in the foot concerning Windows 7 pricing for netbooks, so expect more netbook owners to choose the Linux path.. However, a larger competitor is waiting in the wings for the netbook market - Google's Android OS!Having used an HTC Magic for a few days, and seen what it can do, I can't wait to try a beta version for netbooks. This could take off very fast, particularly in Asia...
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Hello,Less than two weeks ago, a team of investigators published evidence Redmond has hired paid "bloggers" to throw FUD propaganda everywhere on the net talking about Linux.Yes Redmond is afraid modern Linux desktop, no virus, no bloatware/crapware might atract millions.All these tactics do not look like a self-confident company quietly assured of the quality and value of it's sofware........Alejo
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    The above person - Mike Criley - must be a provacateur. I quote: After buying a Linux netbook I can report that Linux is not recommended for normal everyday users.Although it is a free operating system, a user has to use a console,...What is he talking about? The netbooks I have seen had just opposite problem. For some taste, the console was too well hidden. The netbooks I know have drivers for the included components, and everything works out of the box.Perhaps he even gets paid for spreading these lies and rubbish. Has Microsoft gon as far as to pay people like this? The site http://itsbetterwithwindows.com/is about the same level, and that is paid by Microsoft.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    After buying a Linux netbook I can report that Linux is not recommended for normal everyday users.Although it is a free operating system, a user has to use a console, insert coding, scavange the web for the right code and put up with many irritations such as devices refusing to work due to no driver support, or repositories disappearing, support for Windows apps via WINE being limited and Linux programs not being extensive enough in their scope and capabilities.Linux has about 5 years to go before it's a viable sytem for netbooks. It needs to be interface based. One shouldn't be expected to rummage the net for coding to swap desktop backgrounds, icons or sounds. Until all netbook ready Linux distros have proper GUI's and device support, Linux is a no no!
    Anonymous 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    ....as the conditions described in Mike's comments are not typical. Linux is not Windows and has a different (often more logical and faster) ways of getting things done. To my knowledge (and I've been using desktop Linux for over a year) one doesn't always have to use the command line. Most Linux flavors have a sophisticated graphic interface which is quite intuitive, pleasant to use and usually much more sexier than what you get with Windows. Linux based projects can be customized and there are many different flavors of it. Mike may have not liked the flavor he tried out but maybe with a bit of patience, he could have found the flavor that suited him?Linux based projects are community driven and rather than poopooing our efforts, why not contribute and help? What does anyone gain by doing free (I assume you've not been paid) advertising for a humongous corporation such as M$?I suspect that Mike has probably dabbled with Linux for a short period and then couldn't be bothered learning anything. Or perhaps he works for one of the many companies who are affiliated with M$? Newcomers may need take time to learn the 'linux' ways of doing things, but what you get in return is potentially a lifetime of free and open source software which is yours to customize, extend and distribute as you please. If you have any troubles there is plenty of people willing to help and you don't have to pay a penny for it!

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      Small BusinessWhite Papers & Webcasts

      White Paper

      Microsoft Volume Licensing Comparison - Small/Med. Business

      This quick-reference document lets small and medium organizations (i.e. those with five or more devices) to easily compare the available Microsoft Volume Licensing programs to create a simple, cost-effective and flexible way to benefit from volume licensing.

      White Paper

      ESG: Oracle Database Appliance: A Simple, Economical Option for SMBs and Independent Software Vendors

      Read this technology overview of a DBMS built for SMBs that provides a rapidly-deployable, highly-available platform at an affordable cost

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question