More Windows 7 on Your Netbook Arguments

By James Gaskin  7 comments

As we get closer to the promised release date of Windows 7 (we'll see if it really does appear in October), both hype and tempers rise. Add in the netbook question, which forced Microsoft to keep XP available since Vista does so poorly on the underpowered netbook processors, and hype and tempers rub together to create some sparks. So let's take a quick look at some of the arguments for Windows 7 on netbooks and see what we can learn.

One reader claims Windows 7 is a completely new code base from Vista and therefore can't be compared to the current operating system whipping boy. I disagree. Vista provides the foundation for almost all of Windows 7. Saying otherwise means your delusions overwhelm reality, which does neither you nor Windows 7 any good.

Many readers report they're using some version of Windows 7 and love it. Several report they installed it on their own netbook, and performance does quite well even to the point of being better than the Windows XP operating system they replaced.

If these examples of high performance on the netbook platform carry forward when the official Windows 7 hits the streets, the results will be great for Microsoft and bad for the desktop Linux world. There will also be many more users disappointed in their netbook performance.

First, let's talk about the Linux lovers being outsmarted once again by Microsoft. When they first appeared, netbooks used Linux to squeeze the most performance from the weak processor and limited memory. They weren't laptops as much as mobile computing appliances relying on the browser to connect to Web sites for applications. The biggest problem is that political arguments inside the Linux community meant video format support was missing in the earliest models, making them far less user friendly than Windows XP.

Had the first netbooks shipped with media friendly Linux installations, fewer complaints would have meant a smaller chance for Microsoft to come back in and take over the market with XP. Linux groups make great software but lousy marketing plans, and Microsoft once again beat them in the marketplace where it really matters.

Second, running Windows 7 on a netbook will lead to some measure of disappointment in the users who think they're buying a smaller, cheaper laptop rather than a netbook. These people whine and moan because they can't run seven windows of PhotoShop on a 1GB netbook and give netbooks a bad name. Actually, I think they give stupid buyers trying to get away cheap a bad name. No matter what I think, however, there will be many reports of how lousy netbooks are with Windows 7 because they're being misused. Wish that wouldn't happen, but it almost certainly will.

I'm still dubious the official shipping version of Windows 7 will be slimmer and faster than the version of Vista it replaces. However, Microsoft is famous for banging their head against the wall until they finally break it down and control the market. I'm betting more than even money they'll be able to do the same with Windows 7 on your netbook.

7 comments

    Anonymous 2 years ago
    I have to say that I am very supprised with Windows 7 and the NetBooks I am running on. I have three different ones, Asus eeePC, HP Mini and the Acer. I are a power user of sorts. I run Office 2007, MS Communicator with Video along with a host of other tools. I don't do any CPU intensive editing but some of the things in Office, as well as IM are somewhat resource intensive. My concerns we more with Office, Abobe Acrobate Writter etc. but all devices work ideally. I work for a tech firm and have many devices and have three laptops running Vista Ultimate. The all work well but startup and shutdown are a time consuming event. The only drawback with Windows 7 is power managment drives which are not released as of yet.Windows 7 and Netbooks = Happy Computing!
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    The one thing that everyone keeps overlooking is that the majority of the Linux groups run in a socialist manner; they don't give a damn if they ever make so much as one cent on what they do, but rather, that everything in the software, at every single conceivable step in the process, is completely open and the functional nature thereof is disclosed.A lot of video codecs are proprietary, and to include support, would mean that these people would end up delivering something that is less than 100% open, something would be a "black box", whose functional nature would be unknown, and without any real manner for someone to find out how it works.Of course, capitalism must be better, because without it, I'd have health care!
    Anonymous 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    Yeap that is exactly how I feel about this whole thing. Not to mention that Microsoft paid off these retailers to remove Linux Netbooks from the shelve, so that whole codecs thing is bullshit. Capitalism will always win in this greedy society. There is no room from "For the good of the People" because if it were Linux would have ruled a long time ago!
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Microsoft has every right to put Windows seven on any pc that they can. That said, which company wants to lose the bread-and-butter --- gravy that feeds them. However, It is up to windows 7 to be price competitive, as linux does provide what most home owners require. Linux provides web browser, email client, a MSN Messenger equivalent, A full office suite, and reams of open source no charge software. Linux is addressing the GUI stuff, and I feel confident that by early next year, that problem with 3D graphics, etc, will be resolved very amicably.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    How's this for misusing a netbook...eepc 1000HE (2Gb ram), Windows 7 Ultimate + Visual Studio 2008 Pro... not a configuration a would use for serious development, but one that works and already saved my butt a few times.

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      Small BusinessWhite Papers & Webcasts

      White Paper

      Microsoft Volume Licensing Comparison - Small/Med. Business

      This quick-reference document lets small and medium organizations (i.e. those with five or more devices) to easily compare the available Microsoft Volume Licensing programs to create a simple, cost-effective and flexible way to benefit from volume licensing.

      White Paper

      ESG: Oracle Database Appliance: A Simple, Economical Option for SMBs and Independent Software Vendors

      Read this technology overview of a DBMS built for SMBs that provides a rapidly-deployable, highly-available platform at an affordable cost

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question