Will Ubuntu Linux switch to a monthly release cycle?

As a rapid release schedule is proposed, Ubuntu's community manager defends the new Unity interface.

By Katherine Noyes, PC World |  Software, Linux, Ubuntu 2 comments

There seems to be no end to the major changes being tossed around for Ubuntu this year.

Fans of the leading Linux distribution are already well-acquainted with Unity, the new desktop interface that was introduced in version 11.04, or "Natty Narwhal," back in May. Some have loved that change, but plenty of others haven't, causing no end of debate over the distribution's current course.

Just this week, in fact, Ubuntu community manager Jono Bacon wrote a blog post defending many of the interface decisions made for the Unity desktop expected to appear next month in Ubuntu 11.10, or Oneiric Ocelot.

Now, however, it looks like there may be another big change coming down the pike. Specifically, in what feels almost like a tip of the hat to Firefox, a proposal has been made to switch Ubuntu to a monthly release cycle.

'User Confidence Is Lost'

In a blog post published Thursday, Scott James Remnant--a former Ubuntu Developer Manager and now member of the Ubuntu Technical Board--describes several key problems associated with Ubuntu's current six-month release cycle.

"So you're an Ubuntu developer working on features for the upcoming release, you don't have anywhere near as much time as you'd expect to actually do the development work," Remnant wrote. "What happens if you're replacing something that works with something completely new? Can't you just target a later release, and work continually until the feature freeze of that release?

"It turns out that you can't," he explained. "There is an incredible emphasis on the Ubuntu planning process of targeting features for particular releases. This is the exact thing you're not supposed to do with a time-based release schedule."

One result of that schedule, Remnant asserted, is that "three out of four of your releases are really just unstable previews of that final fourth release." That, in turn, is a problem because "developer time is wasted; because user time is wasted; because user confidence is lost."

'There Would Be No Codenames'

As a possible solution to those and other related problems, Remnant proposes switching Ubuntu to a rapid monthly release process, beginning with the 11.10 release due in October.

Following that version, then, release 11.11 would arrive in November, version 11.12 would come in December, version 12.01 would be released in January, and so on.

"This monthly release would be simply known as release in your sources.list, updates would be published to it on the first week of the month," Remnant explained. "There would be no codenames, and due to the rapid releases, changes would be largely unsurprising and iterative on the previous releases."

Alpha, beta and "release" versions would be available to users under this scenario, allowing them to decide how "bleeding edge" they want their operating system to be, Remnant noted. In a process similar to what's used in the Debian "testing" distribution, features would be pushed into the alpha stage only when they're ready, followed by beta and then "release."

'People Like to Explore'

Whether Remnant's proposal is accepted remains to be seen. In the meantime, community manager Jono Bacon shared thoughts of his own about why Unity has been designed the way it has.

Regarding recent changes to menu and window controls in the new beta version of Ubuntu 11.10, for example, "People like to explore," Bacon wrote in a blog post on Tuesday. "It will take next to no time for Ubuntu users to discover that hovering over the text in the panel will display the menu and the window controls. The same can be said for discovering that if you hit the left side of the screen the Launcher appears. The point here is that when you have discovered that the menu is there, you don't need it to be visible all the time."


Originally published on PC World |  Click here to read the original story.

ITworld LIVE

SoftwareWhite Papers & Webcasts

White Paper

Activities Streams Base An Integrated Social Layer

The enterprise social software market is exploding thanks to converging trends of consumerization, cloud, and mobile. In this must-read report, "The Forrester Wave: Activities Streams, Q2 2012", Forrester Research Inc. evaluated five social software vendors with core strengths in the stream based on the overall strength of vendors' current offerings, a clear product strategy, and vendor market presence. In a detailed look at the space, Forrester named Yammer as a leader.

White Paper

ESG Lab Review: HP 3PAR Peer Motion Software

This ESG Lab review sponsored by HP + Intel documents hands-on testing of HP 3PAR Peer Motion Software's distributed volume.Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries.

White Paper

ESG Lab Review: HP 3PAR Peer Motion Software

This ESG Lab review documents hands-on testing of HP 3PAR Peer Motion Software's distributed volume management with a focus on federated workload balancing, asset management, and thin provisioning.Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries.

White Paper

Deliver Cost-Effective Business Continuity with Extreme Capacity

IBM DB2 provides application cluster transparency technology that equips organizations running OLTP applications with the ability to deliver high availability and continuous uptime for transactional data, plus the flexibility and capacity they need to remain competitive.

White Paper

What Developers Want: The End of Application Redeploys

Eliminate application restarts in Java with JRebel! JRebel is a JVM plugin that eliminates application redeploys from the Java development cycle, a process that takes over 10 minutes of coding time away from developers each working hour, according to a recent survey. Just code, refresh and see everything instantly.

See more White Papers | Webcasts

Ask a question

Ask a Question