Judge not satisfied with Google's disclosures over commenter pay

The original order wasn't just for 'quid pro quo' situations, Judge William Alsup says

By , IDG News Service |  Software

"Google can do it too by listing all commenters known by Google to have received payments as consultants, contractors, vendors, or employees," Alsup added. As for organizations receiving money, they need not be listed unless one of its employees was a commenter. Gifts to universities can be ignored."

Also, Google does not need to consider advertising revenue received by commenters as payment, Alsup said.

In its own response to Alsup's initial order, Oracle alleged that Google maintains an extensive network of "influencers," among them attorneys, lobbyists and bloggers, that help further its "intellectual property agenda."

Google brought this network to bear on the case in order to "help shape public perceptions concerning the positions it was advocating throughout this trial," Oracle alleged. Oracle also named two "prominent" individuals, Computer and Communications Industry Association CEO Ed Black and author Jonathan Band, saying they have ties to Google and wrote about topics germane to the case.

Oracle sued Google in August 2010. The case concluded earlier this year, with Google largely exonerated, but Oracle is planning to appeal.

Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris' email address is Chris_Kanaracus@idg.com

Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Answers - Powered by ITworld

ITworld Answers helps you solve problems and share expertise. Ask a question or take a crack at answering the new questions below.

Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Ask a Question