SharePoint backup and recovery solution comparison

January 4, 2009, 10:00 PM —  SharePointReviews.com — 

Curt Spanburgh of Windows IT Pro has recently evaluated four SharePoint Backup and Recovery solutions. His team tested the latest products from Quest Software, AvePoint, Syntergy, and Symantec, and found a wide array of capabilities and features for users of SharePoint 2007. Unforfunately, missing from the comparison are another two very popular products: CommVault Galaxy Backup and Recovery for SharePoint and Data Protection Manager by Microsoft. If you are running an EMC shop you should also take a look at EMC Backup Manager for SharePoint. Here is a quick summary of the reviewed solutions.



Quest Recovery Manager - Rating 4 out of 5

PROS: Allows granular recovery; can recover data from SharePoint databases; inexpensive; helpful installation process exposes problems before deployment; familiar interface

CONS: Requires a deeper-than-usual knowledge of SharePoint’s administrative interface and command-prompt tools

PRICE: $4,995 per front-end server

BOTTOM LINE: The uncomplicated interface and pared-down options make this a good, easy-to-use option for the junior administrator.



DocAve 4.5 Backup and Recovery - Rating 4 ½ out of 5

PROS: The most complete package reviewed; has additional tools for site collection management (requires purchasing of additional modules)

CONS: Difficult learning curve; giant user manual; expensive

PRICE: $2,995 per front-end server (new DocAve 5.0 release is $3,495 per each server in the farm)

BOTTOM LINE: If you have a large, complex, and busy SharePoint deployment, this is the package you want.



Syntergy Replicator for SharePoint Standard Edition - Rating 3 out of 5

PROS: Eliminates the need to upgrade marginal bandwidth for remote-site replication; offers a unique approach to disaster recovery by using replicates on other production servers as a recovery source; vendor works closely with customers to help with customization

CONS: Expensive; not a true backup and recovery solution

PRICE: $25,000 for the first two servers and $7,500 for each additional server

BOTTOM LINE: This product should be used in conjunction with one of the other products tested here for backup and recovery of granular data in your content databases. For the right scenario, it provides a layer of data integrity that’s impossible with native tools alone.



Symantec Backup Exec Agent for SharePoint - Rating 3½ out of 5

PROS: Performs well in basic backup and recovery of items in list and document libraries; includes the agent to back up the SQL Server databases; leverages existing Backup Exec infrastructure

CONS: Requires the basic Backup Exec server product

PRICE: $1,095.99 for a single-server environment

BOTTOM LINE: This product is a logical choice for a shop that already has a Backup Exec system. If you need more than backup and restore, look at the other products reviewed in this article.


To view these features in the easy-to-read table, visit this SharePointReviews.com article.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Close

On Twitter now

sharepoint

Powered by Twitter
You are logged in | Sign out
Sign in and post to Twitter

What are you thinking?

Cancel Tweet sent

On Twitter now

Comments

Sharepoint document recovery

Yes, its never been easy to perform sharepoint document recovery. SharePoint administrators face tough times to perform such a difficult task when the backups turn bad or their are accidental deletion of files from WSS sites....

one such easy to understand and perform recovery tool is from

http://www.nucleustechnologies.com/sharepoint-document-recovery.html
| reply
peer-to-peer

Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly

claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century

pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin

Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?

sjvn
64-bits of protection?

jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith

mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive

 

Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Featured Sponsor

AISO founders envisioned a Web hosting company that was environmentally friendly. While the company employed energy-efficient innovations like solar panels, its infrastructure produced unacceptable power and cooling requirements. Find out how AISO leveraged AMD technology to overcome their challenge in this case study white paper.

In this whitepaper, Scalar explores the opportunity to change the landscape with respect to mission critical databases built around Oracle. Leveraging technologies such as Linux, high-end commodity processing power and Oracle RAC technology to architect, design, build and maintain database infrastructure that delivers maximum availability, reliability and performance at a fraction of traditional cost.

On a typical day, weather.com, the Web site for The Weather Channel in Atlanta, serves up between 15 million and 20 million page views. But in September 2004, when back-to-back hurricanes ransacked Florida, the peak traffic on one day more than tripled: over 70 million page views by more than 7 million unique visitors. Read the full success story now.

Marketplace