Most firms have no big data plans, survey finds

IT pros say they have a tough time making the business case for the technology

By , Computerworld |  Big Data

Hybrid arrays, using SSDs alongside rotating disks, approached majority use in enterprise datacenters, while new players abound for all solid-state arrays and in server SSDs. EMC far outpaced competitors as the No. 1 vendor for solid state in hybrid arrays. EMC was followed by NetApp, Hitachi Data Systems (HDS), IBM, HP, Oracle and Dell.

Which vendor's products are being used for solid-state drives in Hybrid arrays?

When asked which vendors are supplying them with solid-state storage for servers, Fusion-io topped the list, followed by IBM, HP, Oracle, Dell and Seagate. EMC was in the ninth spot, behind NetApp.

Solid-state vendors selected as exciting by those surveyed include: Fusion-io, Pure Storage, Nimbus Data, Nimble Storage, Gridiron Systems and Kove. With the exception of Kove, which makes an all-DRAM appliance, the latter companies sell PCIe flash cards and all-flash arrays or appliances.

Fusion-io was the vendor of choice for solid-state in servers, followed by IBM, HP, Oracle and Dell. Seagate was in sixth place.

When asked whether they'd implemented all-flash arrays, 7% said they are already using the technology, while 86% said it's not currently in their IT plans. Another 4% indicated they plan to purchase all-flash arrays, but not for another six to 18 months. Two percent plan to implement the technology after 18 months.

Matt Wattles, enterprise infrastructure architect for Mitsubishi Power Systems Americas, didn't participate in TheInfoPro survey. But he said his organization did install an all-flash array from Nimbus Storage last December in order to address an I/O slowdown in his SAP environment.

Wattles initially tried putting a second set of processors in all of his SAP servers and bumped up the RAM to its maximum capacity, but the problem persisted. He finally narrowed the performance problem down to his terabyte-sized SAP database and loading data from primary storage, which at the time was an EVA array from Hewlett-Packard. The cost of adding SSDs to the EVA was more expensive than purchasing an all-flash array, Wattles said.

The Nimbus array with 2TB of storage capacity cost around $40,000, he said.

The superior performance of the flash storage on the Nimbus array not only eliminated the database bottleneck, it also slashed data backup times from four hours on the EVA to 15 minutes using the new flash array.

"I like the performance so far. There hasn't been a single glitch," he said. "I think got the array in one morning and had it up and running that afternoon. That's how easy it was."

Wattle's environment isolated the flash storage to one application: SAP. But those who took TheInfoPro survey see the automated tiering of data, or the ability to migrate data among various drive types in an array, as the hottest storage technology going.

Originally published on Computerworld |  Click here to read the original story.
Join us:






Big DataWhite Papers & Webcasts

See more White Papers | Webcasts

Ask a Question