You are not authorized to post comments.

Optimizing Exchange and Active Directory Backup and Recovery

By Pat Hanavan, Symantec Corp.  |  Storage, active directory, backup Add a new comment

Microsoft Exchange has become the de facto application for business communication today. Exchange servers house everything from confidential records, to intellectual property, to key business contacts and more and are often the primary source of storing business critical information.

Needless to say, protecting this data is a business priority. Should a system crash, a database become corrupt, or another event occur that results in the loss of Exchange data, recovery must be rapid and reliable. What’s more, because Exchange uses Microsoft Active Directory as its enterprise directory, it is also critical that the directory’s data is also protected and quickly recoverable.

To optimize backup and recovery of Exchange and Active Directory environments, organizations can leverage a growing number of advanced tools that overcome the challenges of traditional approaches. These new tools give businesses a more simplified and streamlined process that reduces their backup windows, provides continuous protection and delivers efficient granular recovery of the critical business information.

Challenges of Traditional Approaches to Protecting Exchange
To maintain the availability of Exchange and protect its mission-critical data stores, organizations typically do an online backup of the Exchange database. Such a backup is mandatory since it provides the only means for retrieving all Exchange Server data. Fortunately, because many backup solutions leverage Microsoft’s Exchange backup API, most of today’s backup applications perform an Exchange database backup in much the same way.

If the organization needs the ability to quickly recover individual email messages or mailboxes—for example, to meet regulatory, or emergency needs—they traditionally must also perform separate brick-level mailbox backups. Done weekly at a minimum, this level of backup enables organizations to restore an entire mailbox, single email message, calendar item, note, or other Exchange item for those mailboxes which are backed up.

The trouble is, these mailbox backups are very costly in terms of time and storage space, much more so than those mandatory Exchange database backups. After all, the administrator must run two separate backups of the same data, which more than doubles the time commitment and introduces twice the opportunity for error. They also typically result in larger catalog sizes, quickly consuming tape and disk space and adding to an already significant administrative burden.

That’s not all. Most organizations will also need to do incremental backups of the Exchange database and incremental backups of individual mailboxes so they can meet strict recovery point objectives (RPOs) as well as recovery time objectives (RTOs).

With most IT organizations today looking to replace inefficient processes with more efficient and effective strategies to meet their Exchange backup and recovery requirements, yesterday’s approaches must give way to more advanced practices that yield more promising returns.

Challenges of Traditional Strategies for Recovering Active Directory
Active Directory may be the cornerstone of organization and management in Windows-based environments, but far too often Active Directory objects are accidentally modified or deleted, their attributes overwritten by faulty scripts, or a hardware failure corrupts the entire database. Not only does this result in reduced user productivity, it can also cause a negative ripple effect on other Active Directory-dependent applications, including Exchange.

ITworld LIVE

StorageWhite Papers & Webcasts

White Paper

Using BD for Smarter Decision Making

This paper looks at new developments in business analytics and discusses the benefits analyzing big data bring to the business.

White Paper

Protecting Against Database Attacks and Insider Threats: Top 5 Scenarios

Read this new eBook to learn the top five scenarios and essential best practices for preventing database attacks and insider threats.

White Paper

The Best Way to Build a Cloud -- HP CloudSystem Matrix and HP 3PAR Utility Storage provide solid, flexible foundation

Learn how HP CloudSystem Matrix and HP 3PAR Utility Storage provide a solid, flexible foundation for your cloud environment.Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries.

White Paper

Defining Tier One Storage in the Modern Data Center

This report defines "tier-1" storage in the modern IT world and in the data centers and services that support it. What was a simple environment just a few years ago with mainframes or a few large servers to be supported has evolved into a complex web of virtual machines, clouds, and expanding user expectations -- factors which demand and create flexibility, but do so in a way that pushes a lack of predictability upon the storage infrastructure. Learn what your criteria should be for tier-1 storage.Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries.

White Paper

Converged Storage: Utility Storage - The Ideal Platform for Virtual and Cloud Computing

Server virtualization has transformed corporate IT -- companies have enjoyed major cost savings and have gained flexibility and efficiency. But this has also led to a proliferation of virtual machines and servers that threaten to overwhelm data movement and storage technologies. In this IDG Tech Dossier, learn how utility storage makes for massive consolidation, flexibility and scalability, so IT departments can reduce storage infrastructure and lower costs while improving their ability to respond to fast-changing needs of business units.Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries.

See more White Papers | Webcasts

Ask a question

Ask a Question