Deduplication everywhere

Why you should leverage deduplication across backup and archiving applications

November 16, 2009, 04:01 PM —  www.symantec.com — 

The challenges of information growth are well documented today. In fact, we are at a point where information costs are automatically factored into in all areas of a typical IT budget. Copies of all types of information are everywhere. While organizations express the desire to "do more with less" and maximize efficiencies, storage requirements continue to grow across the data center and within remote offices. From primary storage for applications and virtual machines, to the storage required for backup and disaster recovery, fragmented islands of information develop - often each with its own separate tools, operations and service requirements.

Needless to say, this is creating a fundamental shift in the way organizations manage information. As organizations realize that yesterday’s tape-based approach is proving too cumbersome in today’s world, more companies are turning to disk and deduplication technologies in order to facilitate faster backups, reduce primary storage, and replace tape shipping for better disaster recovery.

In the real world, the adoption of disk and deduplication has been evolutionary, but not necessarily revolutionary. From virtual tape libraries and disk staging to target-based dedupe appliances, many organizations have learned that adding disk and deduplication to the current tape backup environment can greatly improve the overall performance for the top 10 percent of their tier-one workloads. But how should organizations handle the bigger challenges of information management across the vast amounts of structured and unstructured data that exists across their IT infrastructure?

By only applying deduplication at the tail-end of the process, multiple copies of the exact same information will continue to exist and grow on primary storage (e.g. email and file servers). This storage problem causes serious capacity management challenges anywhere large amounts of information exists. The bottom line is, if it takes up space, it costs money.

Deduplication Everywhere
Instead of applying deduplication in one place, users should consider deduplication everywhere. In order to maximize efficiency, consider the possibility of leveraging deduplication in an integrated fashion across backup and archiving applications – as well as storage. By deduplicating data right at the source of creation, organizations can focus on tackling the real problem of data reduction everywhere information resides.

For example, one commercial construction company faced the growing challenge of how to manage business critical information on 180 servers located at 45 remote sites around the United States. Backups conducted in remote locations were typically 100GB to 200GB per server and it took nearly 12 hours for each server to be replicated back to a central data center.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Close

On Twitter now

data deduplication

Powered by Twitter
You are logged in | Sign out
Sign in and post to Twitter

What are you thinking?

Cancel Tweet sent

On Twitter now

Post a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
peer-to-peer

Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal

Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants

pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal

sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7

claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading

James Gaskin
Learn How To Print Pages In Order with Ink Jet Printers

mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much

Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Marketplace