ksh keeps up

March 20, 2001, 12:07 PM —  Unix Insider — 


You're a shell programmer, right? Do you know how far that can take you?


If you use ksh93, you can travel roughly as far as you could with any other scripting language.


You already know it

Most Unix workers have done at least simple command-line scripting with login shells such as sh, bash, tcsh, and so on. Perhaps you've needed the names of the 10 files in a particular directory that were most recently changed, and you wrote:


      ls -1td $DIRECTORY | head -10
   


If you know that much about programming the shell, then you're ready to do complicated arithmetic, network applications, and even GUIs. That's the promise that ksh93 fulfills.


ksh is the Korn shell, named after AT&T Labs researcher David Korn. Korn has been working on ksh for almost 20 years. ksh is upward-compatible with the Bourne shell (sh), it has essentially all the capabilities of other popular login shells, it was a standard for SysVr4 Unix, and it was the reference for the POSIX and ISO shell definitions. It's also faster than other shells, sometimes as much as by an order of magnitude, and it has functionality that makes it a full-fledged language, on a par with Perl, Tcl, and other newcomer languages.


What was the holdup?

So why aren't you already using ksh for everything you do? Probably not for technical reasons. ksh has always been owned by AT&T and other companies (various combinations of Lucent and Novell, mostly). Its license was onerous, compared with those of Perl, Tcl, and Bash. This hindered its adoption in many cases.


Last year, however, Korn succeeded in opening up the source code, and now ksh93 is available in both source and binary forms under a liberal AT&T license. This promotes Korn's positioning of KornShell (the language that ksh93 implements) as a peer of Perl, Python, and so on. "We don't write anything in Perl anymore, because [ksh93] has all the functionality built-in," Korn claims.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Post a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
peer-to-peer

Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal

Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants

pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal

sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7

claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading

James Gaskin
Learn How To Print Pages In Order with Ink Jet Printers

mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much

Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Marketplace