<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itworld.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>search</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/taxonomy/term/178</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Poisoned Google search</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/85108/poisoned-google-search</link>
 <description>Even simple Google search results can lead you into malware, so never ever go on the Web without anti-virus protection.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/85108/poisoned-google-search#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/endpoint-security">Endpoint security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/coppermine">Coppermine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/google">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/malware">malware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/taxonomy/term/178">search</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:08:11 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">85108 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bing vs. Google: A side-by-side comparison</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/internet/71705/bing-vs-google-side-side-comparison</link>
 <description>I freely admit that I haven&#039;t used Bing for anything other than a quick vanity search when it was first released. But a new website (new to me anyway) just might have what it takes to make me switch.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/internet/71705/bing-vs-google-side-side-comparison#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/tip">Tip</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/bing">Bing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/bing-vs-google">bing vs google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/google">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/taxonomy/term/178">search</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/search-engine">search engine</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:58:36 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>nrichmond</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71705 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ask.com bets on semantic search, targeting special audiences</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/internet/70171/askcom-bets-semantic-search-targeting-special-audiences</link>
 <description>In the past eight months, Ask.com has unfurled a set of changes to its search engine that the IAC unit calls a success, although its share of U.S. search queries has actually shrunk during that time period.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/internet/70171/askcom-bets-semantic-search-targeting-special-audiences#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech">Personal tech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/askcom">ask.com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/taxonomy/term/178">search</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:35:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70171 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bing filters out sensitive results for Chinese searches</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/internet/69770/bing-filters-out-sensitive-results-chinese-searches</link>
 <description>Microsoft&#039;s Bing search engine filters out some sensitive results from searches made in simplified Chinese script.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/internet/69770/bing-filters-out-sensitive-results-chinese-searches#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/government">Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/bing">Bing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/regulation">regulation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/taxonomy/term/178">search</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:40:54 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69770 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Google censors China porn searches</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/internet/69637/google-censors-china-porn-searches</link>
 <description>Google disbled Google Suggest features on Google.cn and made several other changes to block smut.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/internet/69637/google-censors-china-porn-searches#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/china">China</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/google">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/taxonomy/term/178">search</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:28:45 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69637 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
