<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itworld.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Windows ME</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/windows-me</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Is Windows Vista Like Windows 2000 or Windows ME?</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/small-business/57217/windows-vista-windows-2000-or-windows-me</link>
 <description>Windows ME was the last gasp of the Windows 9x model. It came out seven months after Windows 2000, but failed miserably while Windows 2000 provided a nice upgrade from Windows 98, and a quick stepping stone to Windows XP, Microsoft&#039;s most popular and well received OS ever.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/small-business/57217/windows-vista-windows-2000-or-windows-me#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems">Operating systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/small-business">Small business</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/software">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/microsoft">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows-2000">Windows 2000</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows-me">Windows ME</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows-vista">Windows Vista</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:24:34 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James Gaskin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57217 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
