<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itworld.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>XP</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/xp</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Windows 7 Smells Far Better Than Vista</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/offbeat/82521/windows-7-smells-far-better-than-vista</link>
 <description>Microsoft sent me two copies of Windows 7 Ultimate  last Friday (the 23rd) and I installed the 64bit version on the refurbished HP mini-tower I bought last year with Vista on it. Based on my interview with William Stanek, author of the just-released Windows 7: The Definitive Guide I did for the Daily Tip on Windows 7 Upgrade, I felt sure my fairly new HP would run 64bit Windows fine. Stanek promised almost every PC bought in the last
three years could run Windows 7 64bit. He&#039;s right in my case.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/offbeat/82521/windows-7-smells-far-better-than-vista#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/offbeat">Offbeat</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems">Operating systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/64bit">64bit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/upgrade">upgrade</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/vista">Vista</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows-7">Windows 7</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/xp">XP</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:16:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James Gaskin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">82521 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Three Reasons You&#039;ll Upgrade to Windows 7 – Time, Money, and Hassle</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/small-business/81459/three-reasons-youll-upgrade-windows-7-time-money-and-hassle</link>
 <description>A few of you will move toward Macintosh and Linux operating systems for more of your computers, but not enough to hurt Microsoft. Windows 7 will become, for three reasons, the most popular personal computer OS in 2012 (assuming ancient Mayan predictions are wrong and we&#039;re still here). Those three reasons? Money, time, and hassle.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/small-business/81459/three-reasons-youll-upgrade-windows-7-time-money-and-hassle#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems">Operating systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/small-business">Small business</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/linux">Linux</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/mac">Mac</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/vista">Vista</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows-7">Windows 7</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/xp">XP</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:12:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James Gaskin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">81459 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Chrome Netbook Operating System By Christmas?</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/small-business/78483/chrome-netbook-operating-system-by-christmas</link>
 <description>One of the tidbits author Jerri Ledford told me during my interview to get information for the Daily Tip entry Chrome Tips and Tricks for Better Browsing was that she felt Google&#039;s Chrome operating system would be on netbooks by Christmas. Yes, that&#039;s Chrome the OS supporting Chrome the browser. A bit confusing, but if Chrome the OS is as good as Chrome the browser, we&#039;ll be happy.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/small-business/78483/chrome-netbook-operating-system-by-christmas#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems">Operating systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/small-business">Small business</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/chrome-os-2">Chrome OS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/google">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/linux">Linux</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/netbook">netbook</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/xp">XP</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:34:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James Gaskin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">78483 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Windows 7 Upgrade Mess Is Depressing</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/small-business/77750/windows-7-upgrade-mess-is-depressing</link>
 <description>For an information company, Microsoft seems clueless on providing clear directions and upgrade paths. What upgrade option do you choose? How much does a Windows 7 upgrade cost? Anywhere from $60 to $300, depending on which of the many conflicting stories you believe. And if you want to upgrade from an XP system, your options range somewhere between “no way” and “plan to spend 20+ hours on the project.” Why can we not get a straight answer? What&#039;s with the dumb Windows 7 upgrade chart?
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/small-business/77750/windows-7-upgrade-mess-is-depressing#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems">Operating systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/small-business">Small business</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/laplink">Laplink</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/upgrade">upgrade</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/vista">Vista</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows-7">Windows 7</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/xp">XP</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:19:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James Gaskin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">77750 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft Throws Windows 7 Discount Bone to SMBs: Throw It Back</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/small-business/76516/microsoft-throws-windows-7-discount-bone-smbs-throw-it-back</link>
 <description>Take the bone Microsoft is throwing us with the measly Windows 7 upgrade discount and throw that bone back. If Windows 7 Professional Upgrade isn&#039;t worth $199 until Microsoft has had time to add a service pack or at least some tweaks, it&#039;s not worth $169 with the discount before the service pack. Ignore this discount.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/small-business/76516/microsoft-throws-windows-7-discount-bone-smbs-throw-it-back#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems">Operating systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/small-business">Small business</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/upgrade">upgrade</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/vista">Vista</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows-0">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows-7">Windows 7</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/xp">XP</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:37:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James Gaskin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">76516 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
