<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itworld.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Design Implementation</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/design-implementation</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Implement first, design later</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/development/58269/implement-first-design-later</link>
 <description>If I were to utter the two words &quot;implementation&quot; and &quot;design&quot; in the context of an IT project, would you be inclined to re-order them in your head? I.e. to think in terms of &quot;design&quot; first and &quot;implementation&quot; second?
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/development/58269/implement-first-design-later#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/development">Development</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/offbeat">Offbeat</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/design-implementation">Design Implementation</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 08:28:08 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sean McGrath</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">58269 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
