<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itworld.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>design</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/design</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Slideshow: What vendors consider sexy design</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/hardware/76767/slideshow-what-vendors-consider-sexy-design</link>
 <description>These machines should speak for themselves when it comes to who made them
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/hardware/76767/slideshow-what-vendors-consider-sexy-design#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/hardware">Hardware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/feature">Feature</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/design">design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/hardware-0">hardware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/sexy">sexy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/slideshow">slideshow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/technology">technology</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:09:28 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">76767 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>BREAKING: Tech press continues to see Macs as all style and no substance</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech/68339/breaking-tech-press-continues-see-macs-all-style-and-no-substance</link>
 <description>See, it&#039;s pretty!  It&#039;s an APPLE RIVAL.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech/68339/breaking-tech-press-continues-see-macs-all-style-and-no-substance#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech">Personal tech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/apple">Apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/design">design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/lenovo">Lenovo</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 18:07:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jfruh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">68339 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Apple Xserve: Can&#039;t servers be elegant?</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech/66059/apple-xserve-cant-servers-be-elegant</link>
 <description>For a company known for its design smarts, something seems to be a problem.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech/66059/apple-xserve-cant-servers-be-elegant#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech">Personal tech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/data-center">Server and data center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/design">design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/macintosh">macintosh</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/xserve">Xserve</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:44:51 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jfruh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66059 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pet Peeves - English</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/offbeat/57873/pet-peeves-english</link>
 <description>A while back I wrote an article about my pet peeves related to XML. Some time soon I hope to write something similar related to my other main weapon of choice, namely, Python. Before that though, I thought it might be interesting to think about the peeve that relates the two.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/offbeat/57873/pet-peeves-english#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/development">Development</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/offbeat">Offbeat</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/design">design</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:48:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sean McGrath</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57873 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nesting Organizational Units Too Deeply </title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/windows/57498/nesting-organizational-units-too-deeply</link>
 <description>On why nesting organizational unitess too deeply can lead to grief in an Active Directory environment.
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/tip">Tip</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/active-directory">active directory</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/design">design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/mitch-tulloch">Mitch Tulloch</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitch Tulloch</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57498 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
