<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itworld.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>upgrades</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/taxonomy/term/401/all</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Upgrade, repair, replace, or limp along?</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/networking/62616/upgrade-repair-replace-or-limp-along</link>
 <description>When money&#039;s tight, how do you keep things going and save money at the same time? I think you need a process to decide what to do with equipment that dies. When are you better off repairing/replacing, when to upgrade, and when to just let it die and do without?
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/networking/62616/upgrade-repair-replace-or-limp-along#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/hardware">Hardware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/management-strategy">IT management/strategy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/networking">Networking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/upgrades">upgrades</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:55:06 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">62616 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Five insane upgrades that you should never do</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/hardware/54424/five-insane-upgrades-you-should-never-do</link>
 <description>Just because you can do something, that doesn&#039;t mean you should. That old truism goes double for computers. But some PC geeks are so fanatical about performance, so doggedly determined to push their hardware to extremes, that they&#039;ll go to ridiculous lengths to wring a few more clock cycles out of their components or add a little more cool factor to their rig.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/hardware/54424/five-insane-upgrades-you-should-never-do#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/hardware">Hardware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/how">How-to</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/pc">PC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/upgrades">upgrades</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:08:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">54424 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Windows XP SP3: Good for many but not for all</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/windows-xp-sp3-nlssi-080520</link>
 <description>Today, we know one thing for certain: if your customers are running certain Hewlett-Packard PCs with an AMD processor, head for the hills. Or, at the very least, don&#039;t install the update. Too late? Bummer.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/windows-xp-sp3-nlssi-080520#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/business">Business</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/channel">Channel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/joel-shore-0">Joel Shore</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/microsoft">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/upgrades">upgrades</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:31:34 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jnaze</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">44485 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Vista vacuum blowback</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/nlsnetworkingvista061019</link>
 <description>My Vista Budget Vacuum column got Slashdotted, so 500 plus message replies alternate between calling me an idiot and a genius. Unfortunately, the Slashdot headline made it sound like the cost estimates were for just Vista. My point is that Vista is the engine pulling a long train of other products and services some vice presidents will demand. Those are the ones that cost money.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/nlsnetworkingvista061019#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems">Operating systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/costs">costs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/upgrades">upgrades</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/vista">Vista</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:26:28 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jnaze</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6987 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Vista budget vacuum</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/nls_networking061005</link>
 <description>Strange times indeed when the stock market analysts hope a new Microsoft operating system will counteract the declining housing market, but that&#039;s the hope of some for next fall. If your company plans to play the Vista game, start cooking your books now. I estimate each Vista user will cost your company between $3,250 and $5,000. That&#039;s each and every  Vista user. Money will go to Microsoft for Vista and Office 2007, to hardware vendors for new PCs and components, and possibly a few bucks to Apple for those users jumping to a Mac. After all, if Apple&#039;s higher cost has been the factor keeping your company from trying a Mac, that factor just washed away.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/nls_networking061005#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems">Operating systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/costs">costs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/upgrades">upgrades</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/vista">Vista</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 15:02:13 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jnaze</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7167 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
