<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itworld.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>FTC</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/taxonomy/term/409/all</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>This blog brought to you by the Federal Trade Commission</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/internet/80274/blog-brought-you-federal-trade-commission</link>
 <description>Bad news, freebie bloggers: The FTC is coming down on you like a tray of dishes -- and not just on bloggers, but anyone who uses social media. If you receive money or something for free and you blog, tweet, write up a positive review on Amazon, or share something nice about it with your 4,987 closest Facebook friends, the FTC wants you to disclose that fact or face fines of up to $11,000.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/internet/80274/blog-brought-you-federal-trade-commission#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/blogging">blogging</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/ftc">FTC</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:13:10 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">80274 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yes, Even You May Be Covered By FTC Rule</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/internet/80015/yes-even-you-may-be-covered-by-ftc-rule</link>
 <description>New rules on paid endorsements may give readers a false sense that blogs are telling them the truth. While many bloggers will doubtless follow the Federal Trade Commission&#039;s requirements, there are too many blogs and too few enforcers.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/internet/80015/yes-even-you-may-be-covered-by-ftc-rule#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/government">Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/blogging">blogging</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/ftc">FTC</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:11:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">80015 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>FTC&#039;s New Rules for Bloggers: A Quick Guide</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/internet/80019/ftcs-new-rules-bloggers-a-quick-guide</link>
 <description>As of December 1, the Federal Trade Commission is going to require bloggers, and prominent tweeters and Facebook types to disclose any paid endorsements to their followers, online friends and readers. These new rules have the potential to change everyone&#039;s online habits. Here&#039;s what you need to know:
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/internet/80019/ftcs-new-rules-bloggers-a-quick-guide#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/government">Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/blogging">blogging</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/ftc">FTC</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 11:48:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">80019 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>FTC tells bloggers to disclose payments, freebies for reviews</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/internet/79862/ftc-tells-bloggers-disclose-payments-freebies-reviews</link>
 <description>The U.S. Federal Trade Commission today released new guidelines requiring all bloggers to disclose any payments or freebies they get from companies in exchange for reviewing their products.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/internet/79862/ftc-tells-bloggers-disclose-payments-freebies-reviews#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/government">Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/blogging">blogging</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/ftc">FTC</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:18:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">79862 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>FTC Web site down Monday</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/government/70268/ftc-web-site-down-monday</link>
 <description>FTC.gov is down for several hours, but no cause is immediately identified.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/government/70268/ftc-web-site-down-monday#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/government">Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/ftc">FTC</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:19:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70268 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Spam drops 15 percent after FTC Pricewert takedown</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/68988/spam-drops-15-percent-after-ftc-pricewert-takedown</link>
 <description>According to e-mail security vendor Marshal8e6, total spam volume dropped by about 15 percent last week, as the FTC got a court order to pull the plug on a notorious ISP named Pricewert.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/68988/spam-drops-15-percent-after-ftc-pricewert-takedown#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/ftc">FTC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/isp">ISP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/spam">spam</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:43:11 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">68988 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Court shuts down &#039;rogue&#039; ISP after FTC complaint</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/68820/court-shuts-down-rogue-isp-after-ftc-complaint</link>
 <description>A judge has ordered that an ISP be shut down after the FTC complained that the company recruits and hosts spammers, child pornographers and other criminals.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/68820/court-shuts-down-rogue-isp-after-ftc-complaint#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/government">Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/fraud">fraud</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/ftc">FTC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/isp">ISP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/regulation">regulation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/spam">spam</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:34:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">68820 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>US FTC drops Rambus antitrust case</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/legal/67971/us-ftc-drops-rambus-antitrust-case</link>
 <description>The FTC has officially dropped its antitrust case against memory maker Rambus, after losing a Supreme Court case in February.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/legal/67971/us-ftc-drops-rambus-antitrust-case#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/government">Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/legal">Legal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/antitrust">antitrust</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/dram">DRAM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/ftc">FTC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/memory">memory</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/rambus">Rambus</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 10:38:54 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67971 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>About Schmidt: Google CEO won&#039;t resign from Apple board</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/business/67635/about-schmidt-google-ceo-wont-resign-apple-board</link>
 <description>Speaking to reporters before Google&#039;s annual shareholders meeting, CEO Eric Schmidt said he had no plans to step down from Apple&#039;s board and predicted that the government&#039;s probe wouldn&#039;t find anything wrong with the close relationship between Google and Apple.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/business/67635/about-schmidt-google-ceo-wont-resign-apple-board#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/business">Business</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/apple">Apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/eric-schmidt">Eric Schmidt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/ftc">FTC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/google">Google</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 11:51:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67635 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why the FTC Probe into Google and Apple Won&#039;t Matter</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/legal/67485/why-ftc-probe-google-and-apple-wont-matter</link>
 <description>Let&#039;s say Google and Apple are busted. What&#039;s the worst that could happen? Eric Schmidt and Arthur Levinson will quietly resign from one of the conflicting boards, and then the problem goes away.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/legal/67485/why-ftc-probe-google-and-apple-wont-matter#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/management-strategy">IT management/strategy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/legal">Legal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/antitrust">antitrust</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/apple">Apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/arthur-levinson">Arthur Levinson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/eric-schmidt">Eric Schmidt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/ftc">FTC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/google">Google</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:19:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67485 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
