<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itworld.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>security</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/taxonomy/term/455/all</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>IBM ISS X-Force Threat and Risk Report</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/81621/ibm-iss-x-force-threat-and-risk-report</link>
 <description>Learn about all aspects of threats that affect the Internet.
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/business">Business</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/business-intelligence">Business intelligence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/management-strategy">IT management/strategy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/data-center">Server and data center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/storage">Storage</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/disaster-recovery-planning">disaster recovery planning</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/ibm">IBM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/iss-x-force">ISS X-Force</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security-0">security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:58:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>kalbanese</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">81621 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sidekick: The Good News &amp; the Bad News</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/81130/sidekick-the-good-news-bad-news</link>
 <description>The good news is that Microsoft says it thinks it can get most of your data back. The bad news is how the problem happened in the first place.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/81130/sidekick-the-good-news-bad-news#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/endpoint-security">Endpoint security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/mobile-wireless">Mobile &amp;amp; wireless</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech">Personal tech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/data-center">Server and data center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/analysis-0">Analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/back-0">back-up</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/danger">Danger</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/microsoft">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security-0">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/sidekick">Sidekick</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/t-mobile">T-Mobile</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:16:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">81130 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Snow Leopard hungers for your data</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/81069/snow-leopard-hungers-your-data</link>
 <description>Usually, Microsoft makes the big security blunders, but with Snow Leopard Apple shows they can also compete with Microsoft when it comes to making awful security mistakes.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/81069/snow-leopard-hungers-your-data#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/endpoint-security">Endpoint security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/software">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/analysis-0">Analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/apple">Apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/mac">Mac</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security-0">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/snow-leopard">Snow Leopard</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:07:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">81069 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Half of U.S. workplaces block social networks – should your company penalize honest users? </title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/80822/half-us-workplaces-block-social-networks-should-your-company-penalize-honest-users</link>
 <description>According to consulting firm Robert Half Technology, 54 percent of US companies block social networks completely. But social networking sites can be effective business tools if used properly. Here are 6 tips for companies looking to protect productivity levels and network security while empowering staff.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/80822/half-us-workplaces-block-social-networks-should-your-company-penalize-honest-users#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/management-strategy">IT management/strategy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/facebook">Facebook</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security-0">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/social-networking">social networking</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:15:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jefff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">80822 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sidekick: Microsoft&#039;s biggest failure yet? </title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/80819/sidekick-microsofts-biggest-failure-yet</link>
 <description>When Microsoft lost T-Mobile Sidekick users&#039; data, it also lost any credibility it might have for security. But, there&#039;s a bigger problem for everyone lying underneath this particular fiasco.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/80819/sidekick-microsofts-biggest-failure-yet#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/endpoint-security">Endpoint security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/mobile-wireless">Mobile &amp;amp; wireless</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech">Personal tech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/data-center">Server and data center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/storage">Storage</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/tech-society">Tech &amp;amp; society</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/back-0">back-up</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/danger">Danger</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/microsoft">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security-0">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/sidekick">Sidekick</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/t-mobile">T-Mobile</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:09:15 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">80819 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Windows 7: Unimproved Security</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/80625/windows-7-unimproved-security</link>
 <description>Windows 7 is much better than Vista, but when it comes to security, it&#039;s just more of the same old, same old as the first security patches make their appearance. 
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/80625/windows-7-unimproved-security#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/endpoint-security">Endpoint security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet-explorer">Internet Explorer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/patch-tuesday">Patch Tuesday</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security-0">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows-7">Windows 7</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:52:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">80625 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mix and match Web browsers are a bad idea</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/79829/mix-and-match-web-browsers-are-bad-idea</link>
 <description>While it&#039;s certainly amusing that Google&#039;s Chrome add-on to Internet Explorer can increase its speed by more than ten-times, it&#039;s lousy security. 
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/79829/mix-and-match-web-browsers-are-bad-idea#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/endpoint-security">Endpoint security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/analysis-0">Analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/chrome">Chrome</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/chrome-frame">Chrome Frame</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet-explorer">Internet Explorer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security-0">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/web-browser">web browser</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:25:36 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">79829 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Conference: &#039;Security: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/tech-amp-society/79761/conference-security-yesterday-today-and-tomorrow</link>
 <description>On November 7th 2009, the ACCU will be holding a one day conference at Bletchley Park, home of the legendary World War II &#039;Enigma&#039; code breakers, and the site at which the world&#039;s first digital computer went operational.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/tech-amp-society/79761/conference-security-yesterday-today-and-tomorrow#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/tech-society">Tech &amp;amp; society</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/bletchley-park">Bletchley Park</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/enigma">Enigma</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/phil-zimmermann">Phil Zimmermann</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security-0">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/simon-singh">Simon Singh</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:58:36 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>alanl</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">79761 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tripwire HIPAA Solution: Meeting the Security Standards Set Forth in Section 164</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/79386/tripwire-hipaa-solution-meeting-security-standards-set-forth-section-164</link>
 <description>HIPAA requires businesses that handle personal health information (PHI) to set up strong controls to ensure the security and integrity of that information. Learn how Tripwire Enterprise helps meet the detailed technical requirements of HIPAA and delivers continuous compliance.
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/business-intelligence">Business intelligence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/management-strategy">IT management/strategy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/it-management">IT management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security-0">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/tripwire">tripwire</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:02:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmcguirk</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">79386 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Beyond PCI Checklists: Securing Cardholder Data with Tripwire&#039;s Enhanced File Integrity Monitoring</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/79385/beyond-pci-checklists-securing-cardholder-data-tripwires-enhanced-file-integrity-moni</link>
 <description>How do organizations pass their PCI DSS audits yet still suffer security breaches? Paying attention to PCI DSS checklists only partially secures the cardholder environment. Learn the next steps for fully securing your data.
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/management-strategy">IT management/strategy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/it-management">IT management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security-0">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/tripwire">tripwire</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:57:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmcguirk</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">79385 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
