<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itworld.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>analyst</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/analyst</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Fuzzing and Product Security</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/64502/fuzzing-and-product-security</link>
 <description>Finally, some real data on the usage of fuzzing is emerging. Who is using fuzzing? How do people see fuzzing being used in the product security process? Forrester has included questions regarding use of fuzzing in to their questionnaire that they send to key industry CIOs, CSOs and CISOs. Security companies such as Cigital are publishing their findings. I have talked with these organizations and will be discussing my findings in this blog and the upcoming webinar.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/64502/fuzzing-and-product-security#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/best-practice">Best practice</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/analyst">analyst</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/fuzzing">fuzzing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/penetration-testing">penetration testing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/qa">QA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/research">research</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security-testing">security testing</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 04:40:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ari Takanen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">64502 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
