<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itworld.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>vulnerabilities</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/vulnerabilities</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Vulnerability Disclosure: Is it Blackmail, Whitemail or Bluemail</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/72334/vulnerability-disclosure-it-blackmail-whitemail-or-bluemail</link>
 <description>Hackers (or security researchers) come with a range of rainbow colored hats. Some guys&#039;n&#039;gals are nice (the White Hats). They find and disclose problems in communication products using approved responsible disclosure models. Others are in the business for money, and are not satisfied by the fame they get for disclosing problems. The process can easily get close to what some would consider unethical, or even direct blackmailing.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/72334/vulnerability-disclosure-it-blackmail-whitemail-or-bluemail#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/career">Career</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/software">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security-research">security research</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security-testing">security testing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/vulnerabilities">vulnerabilities</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:25:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ari Takanen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72334 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Kilo-Day threat and mundane security</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/67214/kilo-day-threat-and-mundane-security</link>
 <description>In the security business we spend a lot of time worrying about the &quot;zero-day&quot; threat that appears out of nowhere and immediately starts attacking a hereto unknown vulnerability. We worry so much that we overlook the vulnerabilities we already know about. The ones that have been hanging around on our systems, known but unaddressed, unpatched and wide open.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/67214/kilo-day-threat-and-mundane-security#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/conficker">conficker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/patch">patch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/vulnerabilities">vulnerabilities</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:19:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67214 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Windows bugs never really die</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/66917/windows-bugs-never-really-die</link>
 <description>Hackers can successfully attack Windows PCs months -- even years -- after Microsoft Corp. fixes a flaw, a security expert said Thursday, because there&#039;s always a pool of unpatched systems.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/66917/windows-bugs-never-really-die#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/analysis-0">Analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/patch">patch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/qualys">Qualys</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/vulnerabilities">vulnerabilities</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:06:44 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66917 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Black Hat &#039;supertalk&#039; halted due to vendor concerns</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/66519/black-hat-supertalk-halted-due-vendor-concerns</link>
 <description>The Black Hat security conference is full of drama again in Amsterdam with the last-minute cancellation of a presentation.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/66519/black-hat-supertalk-halted-due-vendor-concerns#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/black-hat">Black Hat</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/exploits">exploits</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/vulnerabilities">vulnerabilities</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:33:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66519 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Firefox fix due next week after attack is published</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/65118/firefox-fix-due-next-week-after-attack-published</link>
 <description>Mozilla developers are scrambling to fix a critical bug in the Firefox browser after attack code was released Wednesday.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/65118/firefox-fix-due-next-week-after-attack-published#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/firefox">Firefox</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/mozilla">Mozilla</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/patches">patches</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/vulnerabilities">vulnerabilities</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:24:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65118 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
