<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itworld.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Sun Microsystems</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/sun-microsystems</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Ellison: We won&#039;t spin off MySQL</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/software/78441/ellison-we-won-t-spin-mysql</link>
 <description>Oracle CEO urges approval of Sun acquisition, says Oracle&#039;s database does not compete with MySQL.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/software/78441/ellison-we-won-t-spin-mysql#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/open-source">Open Source</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/software">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/larry-ellison">Larry Ellison</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/mysql">MySQL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/oracle">Oracle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/sun-microsystems">Sun Microsystems</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:11:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">78441 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Oracle-Sun deal: VARs Positive</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/channel/66950/oracle-sun-deal-vars-positive</link>
 <description>Some early reports are coming in that VARs are on board with the Oracle-Sun deal. to date though, neither Sun nor Oracle has said much of anything about how the deal will affect the sales channel, but it seems to be welcome.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/channel/66950/oracle-sun-deal-vars-positive#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/channel">Channel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/oracle">Oracle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/sun-microsystems">Sun Microsystems</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:52:45 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dblacharski</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66950 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Oracle&#039;s Sun acquisition is a game-changer</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/channel/66663/oracles-sun-acquisition-game-changer</link>
 <description>I can&#039;t say that it was totally unexpected, but it did happen rather suddenly. The deal between IBM and Sun collapsed, and Oracle wasted no time in swooping in to pick up the pieces with a deal to acquire Sun for $9.50 a share, or about $7.4 billion. What is surprising is that the deal is really not that much more than what IBM was offering.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/channel/66663/oracles-sun-acquisition-game-changer#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/channel">Channel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/oracle">Oracle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/sun-microsystems">Sun Microsystems</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:48:05 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dblacharski</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66663 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Clients focused on products, not rumors, Sun exec says</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/server-and-data-center/66364/clients-focused-products-not-rumors-sun-exec-says</link>
 <description>A Sun executive said customers are more focused on solving their IT problems than on acquisition rumors.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/server-and-data-center/66364/clients-focused-products-not-rumors-sun-exec-says#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/data-center">Server and data center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/sun-microsystems">Sun Microsystems</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:29:11 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ITworld staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66364 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Doesn&#039;t anyone want to buy Sun?</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/channel/65872/doesnt-anyone-want-buy-sun</link>
 <description>The talks between IBM and Sun Microsystems have broken down, and it looks like the $7 billion acquisition of Sun by IBM isn&#039;t going to happen. According to today&#039;s Wall Street Journal, Sun rejected the offer over the weekend, and terminated Sun&#039;s agreement to negotiate exclusively with IBM.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/channel/65872/doesnt-anyone-want-buy-sun#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/channel">Channel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/ibm">IBM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/sun-microsystems">Sun Microsystems</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:16:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dblacharski</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65872 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
