<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itworld.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>spammers</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/spammers</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Spam spoofs e-mail client</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/75388/spam-spoofs-e-mail-client</link>
 <description>
Summer appears to be the time of year when spammers get creative. 
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/75388/spam-spoofs-e-mail-client#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/spam">spam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/spammers">spammers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/summer">summer</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:38:39 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CaraGarretson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">75388 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Canada lacks anti-spam legislation, plays catch-up</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/63968/canada-plays-catch-maybe</link>
 <description>Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States. Which of these G8 countries is the odd one out? Well, I suppose that each of them is in some way, but Canada is unique among the G8 nations for not having any form of anti-spam legislation. Surprising, eh?
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/63968/canada-plays-catch-maybe#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/management-strategy">IT management/strategy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/feature">Feature</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/anti-spam">anti spam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/anti-spam-legislation">anti spam legislation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/spam">spam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/spammers">spammers</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:30:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gzammit</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">63968 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The last line of defense against spam</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/61827/last-line-defense-against-spam</link>
 <description>Many organisations that implement an email anti-spam solution will apply a multi-layered approach.  They will implement a system that includes content filtering, IP block lists, quarantine of suspected spam items, Bayesian detection, and other important features.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/61827/last-line-defense-against-spam#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/feature">Feature</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/anti-spam">anti spam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/fighting-spam">fighting spam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/spammers">spammers</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 04:47:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gzammit</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">61827 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SOHO businesses beware of 419 scam</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/61462/soho-businesses-beware-419-scam</link>
 <description>Spam comes in all shapes and sizes. Besides the traditional email spam, spammers target forums, blogs, and now, for the first time I’ve seen them targeting Web 2.0 B2B sites with a variation of the old Nigerian 419 scam, this one involving advanced fee fraud. Small businesses and one-man shops should take note and beware of this activity.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/61462/soho-businesses-beware-419-scam#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/feature">Feature</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/business-spam">business spam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/email-security">email security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security-0">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/spammers">spammers</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:01:21 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gzammit</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">61462 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>AT&amp;T accused of spamming its own customers</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/60928/att-accused-spamming-its-own-customers</link>
 <description>AT&amp;amp;T appears to have made a monumental blunder. Over the past week they sent text messages to most of their customers. The messages were ads for American Idol, and urged customers to watch the season premiere. The backlash has been considerable as angry users accused the company of spamming them. Many used Twitter to express their annoyance.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/60928/att-accused-spamming-its-own-customers#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/news">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/antispam">antispam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/att">AT&amp;amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/phishing">phishing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/scam">scam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/spam">spam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/spammers">spammers</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:33:36 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gzammit</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">60928 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
