Reduce litigation risk, cut costs with proactive eDiscovery

2 comments | 27I like it!
August 13, 2008, 02:18 PM —  StoredIQ — 

Reduce litigation risk, cut costs with proactive eDiscovery

Companies that take charge by proactively managing enterprise information reduce litigation risk, maintain compliance more efficiently, and save a bundle in the process

Companies of all sizes are facing increased litigation risks and costs today. A great way to reduce those risks and costs is by adopting a proactive eDiscovery approach. If you’re not sure what “proactive” eDiscovery means, this article not only offers a good definition, but also explains the trends that make proactive eDiscovery inevitable, how to implement a proactive solution that can save you money, and how to get started now.

Getting a Handle on eDiscovery
“Discovery” is the legal process that all companies facing lawsuits are required to go through in order to produce relevant documents for the court to consider. Generally, any company with $1B in revenue faces multiple legal matters. They may be spurious, or legitimate—but for good-sized companies, they’re inevitable. What’s notable is that those companies spend between $2.5 million and $4 million a year on legal discovery of electronic files alone.

What’s driving those costs? Part of it is an increase in the number of lawsuits. Part of it are the new regulations that enterprises have to comply with in the wake of Enron, WorldCom, and Tyco. But probably the most important factor driving the increase in legal discovery costs is the rapid growth of electronic data that is generated and stored by companies as part of their ongoing business operations. While technology has made our lives at work easier and more productive, it has also contributed to the proliferation of electronically stored information (ESI). To make things more complicated, as much as 90% of all that information is unstructured and unmanaged. Most companies do not have well defined information management policies in place to manage the explosive growth of this data. This is a recipe that can lead to huge litigation costs later for companies when they have to reactively dig through mountains of information to provide timely responses for eDiscovery requests.

Couple the explosive data growth with the new Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) and you realize that companies need to pay attention – as UBS Warburg and Merck learned – paying $29.2M and $253M respectively for non-compliance in litigation that required eDiscovery of documents.

Clearly the new FRCP rules – unlike many other compliance rules– are being enforced.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Close

On Twitter now

ediscovery

Powered by Twitter
You are logged in | Sign out
Sign in and post to Twitter

What are you thinking?

Cancel Tweet sent

On Twitter now

Comments

Good info. Very informative

Good info. Very informative discussion on the best practices of the eDiscovery process. It is unfortunate that companies have to prepare for the what if situations and still sustain the costs for any unforeseen litigation. I have recently found an article on
eDiscovery that also discuss' the meaning of eDiscovery and how to know if you need an electronic discovery investigation.
| reply

Ursula: Knowing e-discovery

Ursula:
Knowing e-discovery is inevitable, I argue an enterprise can use technology proactively to convey substantive messages that make its e-records more benign. What do you think? --Ben
http://hack-igations.blogspot.com/2008/05/nix-smoking-gun-e-discovery.html
| reply
peer-to-peer

Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly

claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century

pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin

Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?

sjvn
64-bits of protection?

jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith

mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive

 

Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Featured Sponsor

AISO founders envisioned a Web hosting company that was environmentally friendly. While the company employed energy-efficient innovations like solar panels, its infrastructure produced unacceptable power and cooling requirements. Find out how AISO leveraged AMD technology to overcome their challenge in this case study white paper.

In this whitepaper, Scalar explores the opportunity to change the landscape with respect to mission critical databases built around Oracle. Leveraging technologies such as Linux, high-end commodity processing power and Oracle RAC technology to architect, design, build and maintain database infrastructure that delivers maximum availability, reliability and performance at a fraction of traditional cost.

On a typical day, weather.com, the Web site for The Weather Channel in Atlanta, serves up between 15 million and 20 million page views. But in September 2004, when back-to-back hurricanes ransacked Florida, the peak traffic on one day more than tripled: over 70 million page views by more than 7 million unique visitors. Read the full success story now.

Marketplace