Microsoft Terminal Services Became Remote Desktop Services

Don't feel bad if you still refer to Terminal Services. Even Microsoft employees still slip now and then.

By ITworld tips  2 comments

by James E. Gaskin - This tip comes courtesy of Manlio Vecchiet, director of product management for Windows Server, and Michael Kleef, senior technical product manager for Desktop Services and Virtual Desktop Infrastructure. Both, obviously, work at Microsoft.

As the title says, Terminal Services became Remote Desktop Services with the release of Windows Server 2008 Support Pack 2. Don't feel bad if you still refer to Terminal Services: Microsoft employees still slip now and then.

VDI (Virtual Desktop Infrastructure) is an extension of the old Terminal Services that offers a choice of sessions for those needing scalability the most, and those needing isolation the most. Remote desktops can now see both applications (Session Host) and virtual desktops (Virtualization Host) at once if necessary.

Session Host scales significantly more users, up to 100s of users when running a limited set of applications. You can access both from the same client through a portal, but you can't host both on the same server.

Remote users have options for a personal VDI profile. Some users can get a pooled VDI connection, while others can be configured for a personal customized session.

Load those servers up with RAM. Microsoft recommends 8-16GB of RAM, meaning you need 32GB of RAM. Microsoft has planning documents in their KnowledgeBase to help configure your server, but those recommendations tend to underestimate the need for their own code to suck resources. Bulk up.

Printing has been cleaned up as well. Those aggravating printer driver installs needed before? Gone, as print jobs now turn into an XPS (XML Paper Specification) file to print like a PDF file, rather than relying on a particular print driver on a particular client matching a particular printer.

Both Vecchiet and Kleef recommend looking closely at application virtualization, which they admit was a bit of a pain point in WS2003. Where you used to have some conflicts with Terminal Services, you can now use application virtualization to stream those and avoid that issue.

Starting last fall, the AppV CAL requirement disappeared, and now AppV is part of the Remote Desktop Services license. That provides some nice value, and not many techs have discovered that savings to date. The AppV client is still separate, however.

Isolation improvements cut admin time. In the earlier version, different users wrote to the same Registry entries. Oops. Now sessions are more robust, up to supporting 64-bit systems with a new AppV 64-bit version. Put the client on a PC, stream new apps to a current session, and you can stream host access as well.

Although Virtual Desktop is the rage now, a surprising number of companies that start with VDI soon realize Remote Desktop will do a better job for them. That said, Terminal Services, er, Remote Desktop, has been around for years and the curious flock to VDI first, do a pilot project, then move to what works best.

Gold stars for those who remember Microsoft buying Calista two years ago, a company focused on virtualizing the Graphics Processing Unit of the computer and supporting streaming media. Microsoft promises more media help is coming, and if you're monitor happy, they now support 16 at a time.

2 comments

    Anonymous 1 year ago
    The fact is that Remote Desktop Services (formerly Terminal Services) has advantages over VDI, while VDI also has advantages over RDS. That's why most organizations are best served by adopting a hybrid approach, with an optimal mix of RDS (for task-oriented users), VDI (for power users), and Blade PCs (stock traders, graphic designers, etc.) which delivers the most benefit and platform flexibility to the organization.Ericom Software's PowerTerm WebConnect facilitates this hybrid approach by managing access to RDS (Terminal Server), VDI and Blade PCs, all with one management tool, one product.Download a free white paper about this hybrid approach at:http://www.ericom.com/hybrid_VDI_SBC.asp?URL_ID=708Adam
    Anonymous 1 year ago
    How well does this integrate with remote desktop software like Proxy Networks or Bomgar? I want to make sure these server products going forward can still be managed by our IT guy from a distance. Hmm... maybe I should ask him but he's away for another couple weeks. Thanks.

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      VirtualizationWhite Papers & Webcasts

      White Paper

      AppAssure vs Backup Exec

      In this new Lab Report, openBench Labs examines AppAssure backup and replication software v4.7 with Symantec Backup Exec 2010 R2. AppAssure implements changed-block tracking technology to provide data protection for both virtual and physical servers in specific OS environments. In contrast, Backup Exec 2010 R2 uses traditional file-based backup to promote compatibility with the largest number of operating systems.

      White Paper

      Top 5 Requirements for Backup of Virtual and Physical Servers - Greg Shields, Microsoft MVP

      Reports by leading industry analysts like Gartner, IDC and Concentrated Technology suggest virtual servers in 2011 will eclipse physical servers in total server deployments. The majority of today's business computing environments already have both virtual and physical servers at the same time.

      White Paper

      Lab Report - Optimizing VM Backup for VMware and Hyper-V

      Data centers are becoming more difficult to manage and protect as more data and applications are moved into virtual environments. Adding fuel to the fire, CIOs must now deal with corporate mandates to build an IT infrastructure that scales to unknown demand levels and provides service assurance for fluctuating conditions that cannot be accurately projected. The solution is a transition to a private cloud characterized by a hypervisor-independent Virtual Infrastructure (VI).

      Webcast On Demand

      Managing Enterprise Mobility Costs

      Mobile employees, especially those traveling internationally, were spending time and resources finding and making connections. Roaming costs were out of control. The IT Administrator at The Hay Group tells you how he got more control over these costs, providing management with predictable budgets and insights while ensuring employee productivity.

      Sponsor: iPass

      White Paper

      Forrester Total Economic Impact (TEI) Case Study - Oracle

      In this paper, Forrester Consulting examines the total economic impact and potential return on investment (ROI) realized by three Enterprise organizations as they virtualized mission-critical Oracle databases on the VMware vSphere platform. The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of VMware vSphere on their organizations.

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question