How to Recover From Virtualization Disasters

By Edward L. Haletky, CIO.com |  Virtualization, disaster recovery Add a new comment

Disaster recovery, to many people, means not much more than a hot site, but there is much more involved. What exactly is involved depends on how much money you have to put to the problem.

Fully redundant hot sites cost quite a bit in hardware, software, and licensing. At best, they should be exact duplicates of your current environment; at worst, they should be able to run your most important virtual machines.

However, this is not the only aspect of DR that should be considered. Disasters come in all sizes, from the small-scale application failure to the catastrophic natural disaster. Both of these are fairly well understood.

But what about the middle of the road business-continuity and disaster issues, which somewhere in between the extremes in the scope of disaster, but are specific to virtualization infrastructures: single machine failures, SAN failures, VM failures, etc.

For these there are a few tools, mostly from VMware that will help. VMware High Availability tops the list. But any VM-to-VM clustering service will also work to solve these issues.

To help with storage server issues there is also the LeftHand Networks VSA and Xtravirt XVS products. These products use local machine disk to mirror between the systems using software. This way if one system failed, the data is not lost.

These technologies add increased redundancy to the software stack and can replace redundant SANs in smaller shops.
Even good backups add to this concept of redundancy by adding replication features (VizionCore vReplicator and Veeam Backup). These will allow you to replicate VMs from storage device to storage device and place VMs in locations where they are ready to power on at a moments notice. Which is another good way to keep things running if your SAN or NAS device fails.

VMware SRM works with various SAN and NAS devices to allow the SAN or NAS's own mirroring software to work better with virtualization.

As we put more and more VMs on a system we need to consider adding more and more redundancy into the systems. There are already some hardware solutions, like RAID Blade and RAID memory technologies; we have the ability to have redundant switching fabrics.

These software storage technologies add into the existing RAID level redundancy and expand them to include multiple systems.

While hot sites are the end goal for natural disasters, don't forget to plan for the middling disasters by increasing your local redundancy, using these or other tools.

Virtualization expert Edward L. Haletky is the author of "VMWare ESX Server in the Enterprise: Planning and Securing Virtualization Servers," Pearson Education (2008.) He recently left Hewlett-Packard, where he worked in the Virtualization, Linux, and High-Performance Technical Computing teams. Haletky owns AstroArch Consulting, providing virtualization, security, and network consulting and development. Haletky is also a champion and moderator for the VMware discussion forums, providing answers to security and configuration questions.

    Add a comment

    Post a comment using one of these accounts
    Or join now
    At least 6 characters

    Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
    Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
    The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

    ITworld LIVE

    VirtualizationWhite Papers & Webcasts

    White Paper

    AppAssure vs Backup Exec

    In this new Lab Report, openBench Labs examines AppAssure backup and replication software v4.7 with Symantec Backup Exec 2010 R2. AppAssure implements changed-block tracking technology to provide data protection for both virtual and physical servers in specific OS environments. In contrast, Backup Exec 2010 R2 uses traditional file-based backup to promote compatibility with the largest number of operating systems.

    White Paper

    Top 5 Requirements for Backup of Virtual and Physical Servers - Greg Shields, Microsoft MVP

    Reports by leading industry analysts like Gartner, IDC and Concentrated Technology suggest virtual servers in 2011 will eclipse physical servers in total server deployments. The majority of today's business computing environments already have both virtual and physical servers at the same time.

    White Paper

    Lab Report - Optimizing VM Backup for VMware and Hyper-V

    Data centers are becoming more difficult to manage and protect as more data and applications are moved into virtual environments. Adding fuel to the fire, CIOs must now deal with corporate mandates to build an IT infrastructure that scales to unknown demand levels and provides service assurance for fluctuating conditions that cannot be accurately projected. The solution is a transition to a private cloud characterized by a hypervisor-independent Virtual Infrastructure (VI).

    Webcast On Demand

    Managing Enterprise Mobility Costs

    Mobile employees, especially those traveling internationally, were spending time and resources finding and making connections. Roaming costs were out of control. The IT Administrator at The Hay Group tells you how he got more control over these costs, providing management with predictable budgets and insights while ensuring employee productivity.

    Sponsor: iPass

    White Paper

    Forrester Total Economic Impact (TEI) Case Study - Oracle

    In this paper, Forrester Consulting examines the total economic impact and potential return on investment (ROI) realized by three Enterprise organizations as they virtualized mission-critical Oracle databases on the VMware vSphere platform. The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of VMware vSphere on their organizations.

    See more White Papers | Webcasts

    Ask a question

    Ask a Question