Virtualization

3 Days at VMworld

2 comments | 14I like it!
September 18, 2008, 12:51 PM — 

After 3 days at VMworld I have not yet had enough of virtualization, or as a friend of my spells it virtualisation. Taking my own advice I went to the important security sessions and went out on the show floor.

There was an impressive array of vendors with some of the smaller booths providing real innovation. My favorite picks are:

Security: Reflex Technologies, with Catbird being a very close second. Reflex has a pretty impressive toolsuite.

Management: Hyper9's product offering was really impressive for large installations. The drill down capability was outstanding.

Compliancy: vmSight is still one of the best.

Backup: Not a company but the big talk was on data deduplication, or saving storage space by combining like blocks on the device.

Hardware: I really liked Xiotech, an independent company stated they have amazing support. I have been told this by others as well. If you can afford it, it's well worth the look.

Announcements: Distributed Virtual Switch is by far the best thing announced followed by the Cisco Nexus 1000V which makes use of this for VMware's future product VDC-OS.

Overall: Putting faces to handles to names in the VMTN forum.

I will delve more into each of these over the next several weeks but there are the highlights.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Comments

It was really great meeting

It was really great meeting you in person finally.

I have a huge amount of respect and admiration for your talents and contributions to the virtualization environment.

I hope to see you again soon.

Jase
| reply

Xiotech

We have been looking at the Xiotech storage solutions, and frankly, it seems kind of sketchy.

Why? Well, one reason is the way their drive packs are configured, if you have drive failure, You must wait to replace the whole pack, not a individual drive, you can not replace the drive pack until you run out of reserved space. (ISE Technology) What will this do to performance? It seems the vendor doesn't want to share this information, and if I am going to rely on this for a SMB setting, it seems risky.

In my book, this would be fine in a large data center, where you need to cut down on drive replacements.

My 2 cents.

Roger Lund
| reply
peer-to-peer

Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal

Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants

pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal

sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7

claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading

mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much

Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Marketplace