Enterprise Social Networking v Unified Communications

By Martha Young  Add a new comment

I have to concede that enterprise social networking (SN for short) has been around for a very long time. In fact, it has been around so long that it has only recently been identified as social networking. In the not so distant past SN was called unified communications (UC) and collaboration.

I went to the Cisco Systems web site and entered social networking in the search box. They have posted several documents on their site, as recently as September, which directly links SN with UC. The first document is titled: "Social Media Release: Cisco Unified Communications System Release 7.0". In the first paragraph of this document Cisco states: "...Cisco launched the latest version of its market-leading unified communications system which offers customers choice and flexibility while enabling new ways to collaborate with co-workers, partners, vendors, and customers."

From there, I went over to the Microsoft site. They have a white paper, updated earlier this year that links SN with its SharePoint Server 2007. This document addresses how to manage the SN environment.

From Genesys Labs, another well recognized provider of unified communications for the contact center market we have: "...enable government agencies to offer better citizen-centric services...high volumes of incoming e-mails, telephone calls, text messages, chat and even Web collaboration communications."

Then I went to a couple of SN vendor sites. I learned that Lithium Technologies has teamed up with Omniture, Incorporated to provide its users with business intelligence-based metrics. The press release, issued September 16 states, "...companies can measure the impact of social media on key business drivers..." Enterprise social networks must have measurement tools associated with the environment to measure their value to the company and determine the ROI of the SN platform investment. I did not find any references to measurement tools at other SN platform providers, but that doesn't mean they don't have them.

I have calls and emails in to several vendors on both the UC and SN sides of this equation. I'm not seeing a material difference between the two technologies, so it will be interesting to hear how the vendors differentiate themselves.

If you use both these technologies inside your firm, let me know it is working for you. Does SN need to support other management tools? If so, which ones? Is presence and presence availability important in a SN environment? How about identity and identity management?

    Add a comment

    Post a comment using one of these accounts
    Or join now
    At least 6 characters

    Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
    Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
    The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

    ITworld LIVE

    VirtualizationWhite Papers & Webcasts

    White Paper

    AppAssure vs Backup Exec

    In this new Lab Report, openBench Labs examines AppAssure backup and replication software v4.7 with Symantec Backup Exec 2010 R2. AppAssure implements changed-block tracking technology to provide data protection for both virtual and physical servers in specific OS environments. In contrast, Backup Exec 2010 R2 uses traditional file-based backup to promote compatibility with the largest number of operating systems.

    White Paper

    Top 5 Requirements for Backup of Virtual and Physical Servers - Greg Shields, Microsoft MVP

    Reports by leading industry analysts like Gartner, IDC and Concentrated Technology suggest virtual servers in 2011 will eclipse physical servers in total server deployments. The majority of today's business computing environments already have both virtual and physical servers at the same time.

    White Paper

    Lab Report - Optimizing VM Backup for VMware and Hyper-V

    Data centers are becoming more difficult to manage and protect as more data and applications are moved into virtual environments. Adding fuel to the fire, CIOs must now deal with corporate mandates to build an IT infrastructure that scales to unknown demand levels and provides service assurance for fluctuating conditions that cannot be accurately projected. The solution is a transition to a private cloud characterized by a hypervisor-independent Virtual Infrastructure (VI).

    Webcast On Demand

    Managing Enterprise Mobility Costs

    Mobile employees, especially those traveling internationally, were spending time and resources finding and making connections. Roaming costs were out of control. The IT Administrator at The Hay Group tells you how he got more control over these costs, providing management with predictable budgets and insights while ensuring employee productivity.

    Sponsor: iPass

    White Paper

    Forrester Total Economic Impact (TEI) Case Study - Oracle

    In this paper, Forrester Consulting examines the total economic impact and potential return on investment (ROI) realized by three Enterprise organizations as they virtualized mission-critical Oracle databases on the VMware vSphere platform. The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of VMware vSphere on their organizations.

    See more White Papers | Webcasts

    Ask a question

    Ask a Question