Best practices for controlling and managing virtual machines

By David Lynch, vice president of marketing, Embotics, Embotics |  Virtualization, server virtualization 3 comments

This is the final segment of a three part article that looks at the impact of server virtualization on data center management, security and compliance and suggests best practices to control and manage the virtual data center.

Compliance and governance risk

The differences between physical and virtual servers can compromise existing control systems and processes while at the same time the traditional data center management tools are not effective in this space.

This lack of control combined is compounded by the lack effective management tools from the virtualization platform vendors, making tracking, visibility and reporting difficult, while the inherent mobility of virtual machines (VMs) can inadvertently contravene compliance regulations.

All of which, combined with the prevalence of manual process and activity, makes this environment difficult to audit and introduces new compliance and governance risk into the datacenter.

Security Risk

Server virtualization also introduces new security risks into the datacenter with all the configuration and patching issues that this brings. This is a relatively immature technology and vulnerabilities are continually found. These vulnerabilities are usually quickly fixed, but should be monitored and tracked.

The hypervisor is also a new target for attackers, both directly, as well as through potential guest breakouts (where someone breaks out of the guest OS into the hypervisor). The subversion of a hypervisor, referred to as “Hyperjacking”, would lead to a compromised platform, allowing full access to all hosted guests. Malicious software could also disguise its presence from traditional security tools that reside in software layers above the hypervisor. There have been no proven attacks in the wild yet, but it is only a matter of time.

Existing security systems, like the traditional management systems do not work well in the virtual space and server sprawl is a proven danger. Virtual sprawl increases complexity and decreases visibility making auditing difficult and creating pockets of risk.

The Risk Profile

Fortunately, for datacenter security, most folks are just starting out down the virtualization path and have a relatively low risk profile: small populations and limited application sets that are deep within the datacenter, safe from direct attack, with no real visible threats and little evidence of sprawl.

3 comments

    jnaze
    jnaze 25 weeks ago
    An answer to your question was just posted here.

    http://www.itworld.com/answers/topic/virtualization/question/anyone-have-experience-third-party-solutions-virtual-infrastru#comment-194299
    ITworld staff
    ITworld staff 25 weeks ago
    Lorenzo0o0 - We posted your question to ITworld Answers and pinged a couple of our Trusted Voices to respond. You can see any responses here.

    http://www.itworld.com/answers/topic/virtualization/question/anyone-have-experience-third-party-solutions-virtual-infrastru

    Thanks for the question!
    Lorenzo0o0
    Lorenzo0o0 26 weeks ago
    Anyone have any experience with third-party solutions for virtual infrastructure change auditing. Basically, I need to know any time someone makes a change to ESX servers, folders, virtual machines, etc. for compliance purposes. I heard NetWrix Vmware Change Reporter and Quest Foglight are the best available—does anyone have any feedback on these solutions?

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      VirtualizationWhite Papers & Webcasts

      White Paper

      AppAssure vs Backup Exec

      In this new Lab Report, openBench Labs examines AppAssure backup and replication software v4.7 with Symantec Backup Exec 2010 R2. AppAssure implements changed-block tracking technology to provide data protection for both virtual and physical servers in specific OS environments. In contrast, Backup Exec 2010 R2 uses traditional file-based backup to promote compatibility with the largest number of operating systems.

      White Paper

      Top 5 Requirements for Backup of Virtual and Physical Servers - Greg Shields, Microsoft MVP

      Reports by leading industry analysts like Gartner, IDC and Concentrated Technology suggest virtual servers in 2011 will eclipse physical servers in total server deployments. The majority of today's business computing environments already have both virtual and physical servers at the same time.

      White Paper

      Lab Report - Optimizing VM Backup for VMware and Hyper-V

      Data centers are becoming more difficult to manage and protect as more data and applications are moved into virtual environments. Adding fuel to the fire, CIOs must now deal with corporate mandates to build an IT infrastructure that scales to unknown demand levels and provides service assurance for fluctuating conditions that cannot be accurately projected. The solution is a transition to a private cloud characterized by a hypervisor-independent Virtual Infrastructure (VI).

      Webcast On Demand

      Managing Enterprise Mobility Costs

      Mobile employees, especially those traveling internationally, were spending time and resources finding and making connections. Roaming costs were out of control. The IT Administrator at The Hay Group tells you how he got more control over these costs, providing management with predictable budgets and insights while ensuring employee productivity.

      Sponsor: iPass

      White Paper

      Forrester Total Economic Impact (TEI) Case Study - Oracle

      In this paper, Forrester Consulting examines the total economic impact and potential return on investment (ROI) realized by three Enterprise organizations as they virtualized mission-critical Oracle databases on the VMware vSphere platform. The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of VMware vSphere on their organizations.

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question