Virtualization Wars Heat Up Again

March 9, 2009, 09:35 AM —  CIO.com — 

The virtualization marketing wars that heated up the summer competition among VMware, Microsoft and Citrix, then dampened and cooled with the winter weather, are heating up again.

Last week, when VMware was busy hosting its VMworld Europe trade show in France, Citrix and Microsoft announced a series of new products that not only cement their alliance against VMware, but also plug many of the holes each suffers individually in comparison with VMware, according to Chris Wolf, a senior analyst for Burton Group.

Red Hat used the same week to announce a whole new line of open source virtualization tools. Oracle is throwing signs that it's ready to jump into virtualization in a more serious way as well.

Linux-market analyst Katherine Egbert, of financial-analysis firm Jefferies & Co. published a report Monday that read, in part: "multiple industry sources seem to indicate that Oracle will soon improve its server virtualization management capabilities by purchasing privately held Virtual Iron."

Oracle's previous effort on the virtualization front was to include an open-source hypervisor customers could use under its stack of applications. Buying Virtual Iron, the fifth-largest server virtualization vendor, Egbert noted, would be a way to improve Oracle's position in the virtualization market overall.

What's VMware's best response to static from competitors? Its technology is speaking for itself at the moment. Burton Group's Wolf recently authored a report that laid out the features required for a virtualization infrastructure product designed to operate as a critical part of an enterprise data center, comparing the main offerings. (See a summary of Wolf's findings in presentation format, here.)

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Close

On Twitter now

virtualization

Powered by Twitter
You are logged in | Sign out
Sign in and post to Twitter

What are you thinking?

Cancel Tweet sent

On Twitter now

Post a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
peer-to-peer

Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal

Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants

pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal

sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7

claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading

mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much

Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Marketplace