Windows 7 sounds ridiculous

10 comments | 7I like it!
June 2, 2008, 02:46 PM —  ITworld.com — 

At D6, Steve Ballmer and Bill Gates took the stage to discuss Microsoft and the future of Windows with Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher of the Wall Street Journal. After massaging each other's egos for a while, Gates and Ballmer got into Windows 7 and their belief that the Vista follow-up will revolutionize the operating system market. And after taking it all in and listening carefully to what they had to say, I can say with the utmost certainty that they've really lost it.

According to both Ballmer and Gates, Windows 7 will utilize touchscreen technology to reflect their belief that both the keyboard and mouse is on the way out. Even better, that functionality will be available by late 2009 or early 2010.

Right.

Now, other than the fact that by saying Windows 7 will be available by the end of next year or January of 2010, Microsoft has practically admitted defeat on the Vista front, I think Ballmer and Gates have effectively shown how far off Microsoft is on gauging consumer preference.

Suffice it to say that there's no indication that people actually want to use a touchscreen on their desktops at home and implementation alone has proven extremely troublesome. Surely, Microsoft will try to use its Surface technology to its advantage, but I simply don't see the practicality of using it on a desktop.

First off, Microsoft services the vast majority of people across the globe with Windows. If the majority of those people have trouble using a keyboard and mouse, how can we expect them to use a touchscreen where interaction with the OS is even more advanced? Sure, some would say that a touchscreen makes things more intuitive, but I generally only hear that argument from tech-savvy folks who already know how to use a keyboard and mouse and prefer HTML coding to Web surfing and email checking.

What about implementation? If Windows 7 is designed specifically to use a touchscreen, what does that mean for Dell, Lenovo, Acer, and others? Will they be forced to add new, expensive functionality to an already barely profitable machine? Certainly those companies would have something to say about Microsoft's unilateral foray into the future, right?

Along those lines, the relatively homogeneous experience we have now when using Windows will be gone. If Dell spends more money on touchscreen technology and releases better functionality, isn't it safe to say that you would rather use that product than any other because it works much better? In other words, Microsoft loses all control over the viability of its product if people find that the touchscreen is garbage on their PC, Ballmer and company will lose customers through no fault of their own.

Since the iPhone and Microsoft Surface, companies have been touting touchscreens as the future of technology. And while I tend to agree on some fronts, I can't find any reason why I would want it on my desktop. After all, isn't it already being tried in some ways on tablet PCs? We all know how well that's going.

Microsoft is off its rocker with this one. Instead of promising functionality that won't work nearly as well as some want to believe, the company should fix the mistakes it committed with Vista and finally realize that what we want isn't a product that will let us touch the screen, but something that's both secure and reliable.

Is that too much to ask?

ITworld.com

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Close

On Twitter now

windows 7

Powered by Twitter
You are logged in | Sign out
Sign in and post to Twitter

What are you thinking?

Cancel Tweet sent

On Twitter now

Comments

Obviously the author has not

Obviously the author has not met my daughters and their girlfriends, all married with children. Every single one of them were talking at a party about being able to touchscreen their PC's in the kitchen. If 6 women in one tiny party want it, I'd venture to say that "one HELL of a lot of other women" would give their eyeteeth for one also. Some of these women were waitresses before starting families and they used them at work and loved them. One of my daughters even remarked, "It's a hell of a lot easier to clean a touchscreen than a keyboard".
| reply

I strongly disagree with

I strongly disagree with this article's views. Mr. Reisinger thinks Windows Seven is ridiculous, but I, for one, think it is a good idea. Touchscreen capability is the future. However, it is utterly ridiculous to assume that Windows 7 will not have mouse and keyboard support. Once again, Mr. Reisinger has written a completely biased, uninformed and uninformative article that does nothing except tell people what a biased person Mr. Reisinger is. Mr. Reisinger should stop writing such low-quality articles and leave writing articles to people who actually know what they are doing.
| reply

Dear "Anonymous", Huh? Did

Dear "Anonymous",

Huh? Did you read my column? This isn't a discussion on bias, but a discussion on what I think is wrong with Windows 7. You mention that I'm uninformed and my column is "uninformative" and yet, the only comment you can squeak out revolves around your belief that touchscreens are the future without any support for that argument. While that may be true in certain rudimentary set-ups, I'd really like to see how that technology will translate on Windows. The way I see it, Windows 7 IS NOT the way to do it.

I understand that you disagree, but if you want to actually add something to the discussion, say something constructive. Otherwise, it's a waste of time.

-Don
| reply
peer-to-peer

Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly

claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century

pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin

Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?

sjvn
64-bits of protection?

jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith

mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive

 

Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Featured Sponsor

AISO founders envisioned a Web hosting company that was environmentally friendly. While the company employed energy-efficient innovations like solar panels, its infrastructure produced unacceptable power and cooling requirements. Find out how AISO leveraged AMD technology to overcome their challenge in this case study white paper.

In this whitepaper, Scalar explores the opportunity to change the landscape with respect to mission critical databases built around Oracle. Leveraging technologies such as Linux, high-end commodity processing power and Oracle RAC technology to architect, design, build and maintain database infrastructure that delivers maximum availability, reliability and performance at a fraction of traditional cost.

On a typical day, weather.com, the Web site for The Weather Channel in Atlanta, serves up between 15 million and 20 million page views. But in September 2004, when back-to-back hurricanes ransacked Florida, the peak traffic on one day more than tripled: over 70 million page views by more than 7 million unique visitors. Read the full success story now.

Marketplace