Microsoft WebMatrix is a mixed bag

Microsoft's free and easy Web development tool for noncoders has some nice features, as well as irksome shortcomings

By Martin Heller, InfoWorld |  Windows, Microsoft, web development

WebMatrix misses When I first saw the WebMatrix demo, I was very impressed with the smooth way it calculated dependencies and constructed the application stack -- database, interpreters, and connectors -- needed to run a public domain Web application on Windows. It looked like the Windows answer to the auto-installer packages you get for free on hosted Linux websites.

When I tried it myself, I was bitterly disappointed. Sure, the dependencies were calculated, and the primary package came down quickly. However, the download stalled, and I was never able to do a successful installation from the Gallery, even after multiple tries on multiple days.

I had better luck with the templates, but there are only a few of them, and they don't do much. The Bakery demo does show off Razor markup, but frankly I'm not impressed. Yes, Razor requires less markup and simpler code than ASP, PHP, or ASP.Net, but those technologies make a much clearer distinction between server code and client markup than Razor when you are looking at the source of a page.

The new SEO scanner can look at any site -- not just your own -- and point out where the rules in its database have been broken and how to fix the problem. Many of the checks are useful, but mostly at a low level, such as "The page contains broken hyperlinks." Other checks seem to be misguided, based on my own experience doing search optimization. For example, search engines tend to give higher scores to pages with organic body content and no keyword metadata, but the SEO scanner expects to see keyword metadata.

I gave WebMatrix a good grade for documentation, but that is strictly on the strength of the WebMatrix minibook. The help link doesn't seem to work at all from most places in the program -- it just takes you to Bing.

WebMatrix links to a gallery of Windows Web hosting providers, but I'm not impressed. It does bring out the differences between providers that give you plenty of bandwidth, an SLA, and 24/7 support and providers that give you a starter site and no help, but there are too few reviews to get a sense of the quality of the service and support. I can't tell you how frustrating it can be to have a crappy hosting provider without telephone support for a site you care about. (The providers I'm thinking of are not among those on the gallery, however.)

WebMatrix hits But enough with the objections. There are some innovative features in WebMatrix, and Microsoft deserves credit for them.

I like the WebDeploy feature a lot, although it's only supported by some Windows hosts and no Linux hosts. Instead of just uploading your files, WebDeploy can synchronize both your files and your data. If your hosting provider supports it, you don't even have to fill in the parameters on the publication configuration form yourself -- brilliant.


Originally published on InfoWorld |  Click here to read the original story.
Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Answers - Powered by ITworld

ITworld Answers helps you solve problems and share expertise. Ask a question or take a crack at answering the new questions below.

Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Ask a Question
randomness