The pros and cons of using virtual desktop infrastructure

VDI might cost less than buying new PCs, but the biggest savings come from managing a single image for a host of workstations

By , PC World |  Virtualization, vdi

Many organizations continue to run Windows XP on many or all of their desktop PCs, either because migration typically requires costly hardware upgrades, time-consuming transfers of settings, and user retraining, or because there's simply no compelling reason to move users to a new OS and the new application software that goes along with it. In some cases, both justifications apply.

But when you consider that Microsoft has already stopped issuing non-security hotfixes for Windows XP and will end all support for the OS in 2014, that strategy won't be tenable for much longer.

Virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) utilizes server hardware to run desktop operating systems and application software inside a virtual machine. Users access these virtual desktops using their existing PCs. This not only eliminates the need for workstation hardware upgrades, but also enables the user to switch between operating environments, such as Windows XP and Windows 7.

What's more, VDI renders administrative and management tasks much easier, because every attached workstation can use the same image. Install OS and application software updates and patches to the one image, and every desktop system using that image is automatically updated and patched.

VDI offers clear benefits, but there are two sides to every coin. Here's a brief look at the pros and cons of using virtual desktop infrastructure:

1. Every desktop user can utilize the same image.

Pro: Having each user utilize the same image--the operating system as well as the installed applications--reduces administrative and support costs.

Con: You'll need a unique image for each user who requires a different set of applications, needs to save personal settings, or requires the freedom to install their own applications. This will rapidly multiply storage consumption on the VDI server.

2. Processing moves from individual workstations to a VDI server.

Pro: There's no need to upgrade numerous PCs to meet the new OS's minimum hardware requirements.

Con: VDI will require a major investment in server hardware, and possibly in storage and network infrastructure. The total cost of the server hardware, storage, and network equipment might exceed that of procuring a basic PC for each user.

3. Hardware costs can be more easily managed, since almost everything will reside in the data center.

Originally published on PC World |  Click here to read the original story.
Join us:






Spotlight on ...
Online Training

    Upgrade your skills and earn higher pay

    Readers to share their best tips for maximizing training dollars and getting the most out self-directed learning. Here’s what they said.


    Learn more

Answers - Powered by ITworld

ITworld Answers helps you solve problems and share expertise. Ask a question or take a crack at answering the new questions below.

Ask a Question