Hardware

More on preventing RAID problems

June 20, 2008, 02:42 PM — 

In a recent column I mentioned that it's a good idea to label all your drives and drive connectors in your RAID 5 array. That way when a drive fails you won't make the mistake of pulling the wrong drive from the array and hosing your data.

Today, I want to provide you with another tip on preventing potential problems with RAID arrays. The tip comes to me courtesy of a colleague who had the following experience. About a year ago he bought a bunch of hard drives of the same make and model from a vendor so he could build an array for his system. Unfortunately, within a year half of his drives had failed and needed replacing. How could that be? Was it just bad luck?

After investigating the problem, my colleague discovered that the drives he purchased had consecutive serial numbers which means that they all came from the same manufacturing lot. After discussion with colleagues about the matter, it turned out that this was not an isolated incident. In fact, using drives from the same manufacturing lot in an array can often be a recipe for disaster as it can drastically increase the failure rate of drives if your drives happen to come from a bad batch of drives.

What's the lesson here? Mix and match a bit with the drives in your arrays, and avoid whenever possible using drives from the same manufacturing lot. And to be safe, implement RAID 6 that allows recovery from two failed drives instead of the one failed drive that RAID 5 protects you against.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
peer-to-peer

jfruh
Apple syncing patent can't come soon enough

pasmith
New Twitter features borrow from 3rd party clients

Esther Schindler
Open Source Changes the Software Acquisition Process

mikelgan
How to set up continuous podcast play on the new iTunes

David Strom
Five important Windows 7 mobility features

sjvn
Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake                        

Sandra Henry-Stocker
Grepping on Whole Words

 

Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Featured Sponsor

AISO founders envisioned a Web hosting company that was environmentally friendly. While the company employed energy-efficient innovations like solar panels, its infrastructure produced unacceptable power and cooling requirements. Find out how AISO leveraged AMD technology to overcome their challenge in this case study white paper.

In this whitepaper, Scalar explores the opportunity to change the landscape with respect to mission critical databases built around Oracle. Leveraging technologies such as Linux, high-end commodity processing power and Oracle RAC technology to architect, design, build and maintain database infrastructure that delivers maximum availability, reliability and performance at a fraction of traditional cost.

On a typical day, weather.com, the Web site for The Weather Channel in Atlanta, serves up between 15 million and 20 million page views. But in September 2004, when back-to-back hurricanes ransacked Florida, the peak traffic on one day more than tripled: over 70 million page views by more than 7 million unique visitors. Read the full success story now.

Marketplace