Are Linux netbooks really returned more than Windows models

By Eric Lai, Computerworld |  Windows, Linux, netbook 2 comments

Windows' dominance extends to 96% of netbooks sold in the U.S. in February. Worldwide, three-quarters of the 15 million netbooks sold in 2008 came with Windows. But Linux, which now accounts for the remaining quarter of sales, is set to challenge Microsoft this year.

The first wave of netbooks using the ARM processor are expected to hit the market in the second half of the year, all running a version of Linux -- either the Google Inc.-backed Android, Canonical's Ubuntu distro, or even the Intel Corp.-created Moblin netbook OS.

The new wave of ARM netbooks are expected to be cheaper than the $300 to $400 of the cheaper Intel Atom-based netbooks today at about $200, and they are expected to boast longer battery life, as well as instant-on and other smartphone-style features.

Windows: A familiar desktop friend?
Microsoft says that Windows dominates -- and will continue to dominate -- netbooks because customers are looking for a familiar, PC-like experience, as well as compatibility with their peripherals and software such as Microsoft Office.

"Users simply expect the Windows experience," wrote Brandon LeBlanc, a Microsoft blogger, on the Windows Experience blog last Friday. "It's easier to use, just works out of the box with peoples stuff, and ultimately offers more choice."

LeBlanc cited several pieces of evidence focused around anecdotes indicating dissatisfaction with Linux netbooks that customers subsequently returned.

MSI, maker of the popular Wind netbook, said last fall that its research showed Linux netbooks were returned four times more than those running Windows.

"They start playing around with Linux and start realizing that its not what they are used to," Andy Tung of MSI told Laptop magazine in October. "They dont want to spend time to learn it so they bring it back to the store."

Even Canonical echoed MSI's comments to Laptop magazine.

"The customer will get their netbook sent to their home and they imagine to find something like a Microsoft desktop, but they see a brown Ubuntu version. They are unwilling to learn it and they were expecting to have Windows," said Gerry Carr, a marketing manager for Canonical.

Reports say that Carphone Warehouse, a Best Buy-like electronics superstore chain in the U.K., stopped selling netbooks running Ubuntu last December after one in five purchasers returned them. The three netbooks it sells on its Web site today all run Windows XP Home.

Microsoft blogger LeBlanc writes, "When they realize their Linux-based netbook PC doesn't deliver that same quality of experience, they get frustrated and take it back."

Stephen Baker of the NPD Group Inc., which provided the market data, said, "Those Linux return rates jibe for the most part with everything I've heard in the U.S."

No shoo-ins here
But Philip Solis, and analyst at ABI Research, questions the "reliability" of this evidence.

Solis said in a March research note that Taiwan's MSI had not yet shipped a Linux-based Wind at the time of the comment to the magazine. When it did, it did "adapted" the OS for the netbook's smaller size -- an key ingredient to Linux's acceptance, Solis wrote.

Acer Inc., Asus Inc. and Dell Inc. have all built customized versions of Linux for their netbooks. Solis said that Asus has noted equal return rates for Linux netbooks versus those running Windows.

And while ABI's surveys show U.S. consumers clearly stating their preference for Windows netbooks, Solis said that isn't true around the world.

In Asia, netbook buyers are both thriftier and "and not as tied to the Windows environment," Solis said. "They're looking for certain features, but they aren't as tied to a certain brand name."

Solis predicts an increase in Linux netbook shipments this year, from 25% to a third of the 35 million netbooks expected to sell globally this year. Under that estimate, Linux will be shipped on 11.5 million netbook PCs in 2009.

Solis is bullish about his prediction because of the coming ARM wave. With Microsoft still balking at porting Windows 7 to ARM's mobile CPU, PC makers using ARM have no choice but to use Linux.

Also, ARM's low-cost and low-energy attributes will pull the netbook category, which has edging upwards and become less distinguishable from regular laptops, back towards the 'net' end of the product spectrum.

"Netbooks are meant to be more an Internet-based device," Solic wrote. "The fact that so many consumers view netbooks as devices that are secondary to their PCs means there is room to change consumers' views about what a netbook is and what to expect around operating systems and user interfaces."

NPD's Baker flatly disagrees. "If it looks like a PC and is sold in the PC aisle in the store ... people will perceive them as PCs," he said.

2 comments

    Anonymous 2 years ago
    After many years of Win and Mac environments, I bought an Asus Eee 900. I was happy with the netbook overall, but the OS was wrong for me. Seemed to me like it was made for an 8-year-old. Very inflexible. Could not easily uninstall the children's software that took up almost the whole storage and did not have a lot of options of software to add easily.Now I'm running Eeebuntu from an 8Gb SD card, and I love it. My Windows desktop has become a suppport accessory for my netbook. But if I had not found the Eeebuntu, I think I would likely have returned the netbook.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Having been a Microsoft fan for 20 years, and now a Linux fan for the past 5 years, I see very few differences in the desk tops for the casual user: someone who does a little word processing, emailing, and surfing the Internet. So, if Linux-based Netbooks are being returned more than Windows-based Netbooks, it must be due to the customizations done to the particular distributions of Linux being used, and not just the fact that the machine uses Linux.As a matter of fact, without specific reasons from the people who returned the machines, it becomes a guessing game as to why. The article alludes to the reason being that Windows provides a better experience, or that Windows is more feature rich than Linux. Neither of these reasons is true. As for the first, the desktop functionality is the same except for colors and themes. As for applications, Open Office Writer is much simpler to use than Word. Internet Explorer 7 is an excellent browser and so is Fire Fox, and the operation of both is almost identical.As for Windows providing more features, I have to wonder. It has been my experience that the typical Linux distro offers many more features and applications than Windows does.No, I think there is more human nature working here than anything else. As a computer instructor at my local community college, I see over and over people's resistance to change. If something looks different, then it must be more difficult to learn. Unfortunately, Linux carries with it a bit of its past reputation for being an OS for computer geeks, so, many people have the expectation that it is just going to be too difficult to learn. The reality of course is that if they know how to operate the Windows desktop, they can certainly operate the typical Linux desktop.In adding my two-cents to the guessing game, I'd say that it is the more adventurous computer user that orders and buys a Linux-based Netbook and then discovers that the Netbook itself is weak, and therefore not suitable for the tasks that it was bought for in the first place.~jiangshi

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      WindowsWhite Papers & Webcasts

      White Paper

      Microsoft Volume Licensing Reference Guide

      This guide provides an overview of the key features of Microsoft Volume Licensing programs. The information is presented by organizational type and size-two of the most important keys to determining your best Volume Licensing option.

      White Paper

      HP Software Licensing & Management Solutions for Microsoft

      See how HP Software Licensing & Management Solutions (SLMS) can help you identify the best Microsoft licensing program for your needs, get the most from your licensing agreement, and maximize your Microsoft software investment.

      White Paper

      Microsoft Open Value Program Guide

      In this overview, see how Microsoft Open Value provides a flexible, affordable way for small to midsize organizations (i.e. those with five or more desktop PCs) to use and manage all their Microsoft licensed products under a single agreement.

      White Paper

      Microsoft Volume Licensing Comparison - Enterprise

      With this quick-reference document, you can easily compare the available Microsoft Volume Licensing programs for enterprise organizations with 250+ devices, and tailor a program to help save costs, manage multiple licenses, and keep software up-to-date.

      White Paper

      Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Program Brief

      This white paper provides an in-depth look into how the Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Program provides with flexibility to choose among on-premises software and cloud services to best suit your user needs, and helps you optimize your technology spend as business priorities change.

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question